David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Human Studies 21 (3):259-271 (1998)
Based on an analysis of double hermeneutics in the human sciences, a distinction between a weak and a strong rhetorical analysis of human-scientific research is introduced, taking account of the self-reflective character of hermeneutic interpretation. The paper argues that there are three hermeneutic topics in the research process for human-scientific experience, which are associated with applying specific rhetorical tools. The three topics are described under the following rubrics: (a) bridging the gap between experience-near and experience-distant concepts; (b) achieving integrity of the cultural objects dispersed in different interpretive strategies; and (c) taking into consideration that an important task of hermeneutic interpretation in human-scientific research is to give an account of the object's immanent narrative coherence. The paper is written in the conviction that a kind of re-methodologization of philosophical hermeneutics which does not rehabilitate epistemological foundationalism can provide a new philosophical identity to the human sciences.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Modern Philosophy Philosophy of the Social Sciences Political Philosophy Sociolinguistics|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Donald Davidson (2010). What Metaphors Mean. In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Critical Inquiry. Routledge 31.
Mary B. Hesse (1966). Models and Analogies in Science. University of Notre Dame Press.
Joseph Rouse (1996). Engaging Science: How to Understand its Practices Philosophically. Cornell University Press.
Charles Taylor (1980). Understanding in Human Science. Review of Metaphysics 34 (1):25 - 38.
Citations of this work BETA
Dimitri Ginev (2013). Ethnomethodological and Hermeneutic-Phenomenological Perspectives on Scientific Practices. Human Studies 36 (2):277-305.
Similar books and articles
Austin Harrington (2000). Objectivism in Hermeneutics? Gadamer, Habermas, Dilthey. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (4):491-507.
Chris Tucker (2006). Hermeneutics as A...Foundationalism? Dialogue 45 (4):627-46.
Paul Hernadi (ed.) (1989). The Rhetoric of Interpretation and the Interpretation of Rhetoric. Duke University Press.
A. T. Nuyen (1994). Interpretation and Understanding in Hermeneutics and Deconstruction. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (4):426-438.
Theodore Kisiel (1997). A Hermeneutics of the Natural Sciences? The Debate Updated. Man and World 30 (3):329-341.
Calvin O. Schrag (1980). Radical Reflection and the Origin of the Human Sciences. Purdue University Press.
Kurt Mueller-Vollmer (ed.) (1985). The Hermeneutics Reader: Texts of the German Tradition From the Enlightenment to the Present. Continuum.
C. Mantzavinos (2005). Naturalistic Hermeneutics. Cambridge University Press.
A. P. (1998). The Scope of Hermeneutics in Natural Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (2):273-298.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads47 ( #89,893 of 1,907,063 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,221 of 1,907,063 )
How can I increase my downloads?