David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for General Philosophy of Science 32 (1):27-37 (2001)
This paper represents an attempt to articulate the basic principles of a hermeneutic philosophy of science. Throughout, the author is at pains to show that both (i) overcoming epistemological foundationalism and (ii) insisting on the multiplicity, patchiness, and heterogeneity of the discursive practices of scientific research do not imply a farewell to an analysis of the constitution of science's autonomous cognitive structure. Such an analysis operates in two directions: “continuous weakening” of epistemological foundationalism and “hermeneutic grounding” of a cognitive structure. Carrying out the analysis in both directions leads to a (post) foundational picture of science. The main thrust of the first part of the paper is to outline the tenets of a constitutional analysis of scientific research. This part focuses especially on the notion of “unified narrativestructures” which refers to the “effective histories” of the main epistemic types of science.
|Keywords||global horizon of doing scientific research hermeneutic fore-structure unified narrative structures|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
James A. Marcum (2011). Horizon for Scientific Practice: Scientific Discovery and Progress. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):187-215.
Similar books and articles
Harald Wohlrapp (1975). Analytischer Versus Konstruktiver Wissenschaftsbegriff. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 6 (2):252-275.
A. P. (1998). The Scope of Hermeneutics in Natural Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (2):273-298.
Zamora Bonilla & P. Jesús (2006). Science Studies and the Theory of Games. Perspectives on Science 14 (4).
Anita Konzelmann Ziv (2011). Bolzanian Knowing: Infallibility, Virtue and Foundational Truth. Synthese 183 (1):27-45.
Anita Konzelmann Ziv (2011). Bolzanian Knowing: Infallibility, Virtue and Foundational Truth. Synthese 183 (1):27 - 45.
Dimitri Ginev (2005). Against the Politics of Postmodern Philosophy of Science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):191 – 208.
Dimitri Ginev (2009). From Existential Conception of Science to Hermeneutic Phenomenology of Scientific Research. Journal of Philosophical Research 34:365-389.
Dimitri Ginev (1999). On the Hermeneutic Fore-Structure of Scientific Research. Continental Philosophy Review 32 (2):143-168.
Dimitri Ginev (2007). A (Post)Foundational Approach to the Philosophy of Science: Part II. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 38 (1):57 - 74.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #159,606 of 1,102,818 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #296,987 of 1,102,818 )
How can I increase my downloads?