David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Rebecca Kukla (ed.), Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press (2006)
In a well-known passage from the Introduction to Kant’s Critique of Judgment, Kant defines the power or faculty of judgment [Urteilskraft] as "the capacity to think the particular as contained under the universal" (Introduction IV, 5:179).1 He then distinguishes two ways in which this faculty can be exercised, namely as determining or as reflecting. These two ways are defined as follows: "If the universal (the rule, the principle, the law) is given, then judgment, which subsumes the particular under it... is determining. But if merely the particular is given, for which the universal is to be found, then judgment is merely reflecting" (ibid.) As Kant goes on to make clear, the Critique of Judgment is particularly concerned with judgment in its capacity as reflecting rather than determining. It is concerned, that is, with how we are to find universals (which he glosses as rules, principles, or laws) for given particulars. Despite the fact that the term "concept" does not appear in this set of definitions, Kant’s discussions of judgment elsewhere make it clear that this faculty can be identified at least in part with our capacity to think particular objects under concepts, in particular empirical concepts.2 The..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Hannah Ginsborg (2008). Was Kant a Nonconceptualist? Philosophical Studies 137 (1):65 - 77.
Stefanie Grüne (2011). Is There a Gap in Kant's B Deduction? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):465 - 490.
Hannah Ginsborg (2006). Empirical Concepts and the Content of Experience. European Journal of Philosophy 14 (3):349-372.
Melissa McBay Merritt (2015). Varieties of Reflection in Kant's Logic. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (3):478-501.
Alexandra Newton (2015). Kant on the Logical Origin of Concepts. European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):456-484.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Teufel (2011). Kant's Sensationist Conception of Particularity in the Critique of the (Reflecting) Power of Judgment. Kant Studies Online 1 (3):1-51.
Immanuel Kant (1892/2000). The Critique of Judgment. Prometheus Books.
Timothy Rosenkoetter (2010). Absolute Positing, the Frege Anticipation Thesis, and Kant's Definitions of Judgment. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (4):539-566.
Samuel Fleischacker (1999). A Third Concept of Liberty: Judgment and Freedom in Kant and Adam Smith. Princeton University Press.
A. Degryse (2011). Sensus Communis as a Foundation for Men as Political Beings: Arendt's Reading of Kant's Critique of Judgment. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (3):345-358.
Mihaela C. Fistioc (2002). The Beautiful Shape of the Good: Platonic and Pythagorean Themes in Kant's Critique of the Power of Judgment. Routledge.
Immanuel Kant (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment. Cambridge University Press.
Jonathan Bennett (1960). Moral Argument. Mind 69 (276):544-549.
Alexandre Lefebvre (2007). Critique of Teleology in Kant and Dworkin: The Law Without Organs (Lwo). Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (2):179-201.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads85 ( #47,666 of 1,792,844 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #102,533 of 1,792,844 )
How can I increase my downloads?