David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (1):37-57 (2004)
Despite their distinct objects of study, the human behavioral sciences all include models of individual human behavior. Unity in the behavioral sciences requires that there be a common underlying model of individual human behavior, specialized and enriched to meet the particular needs of each discipline. Such unity does not exist, and cannot be easily attained, since the various disciplines have incompatible models and disparate research methodologies. Yet recent theoretical and empirical developments have created the conditions for unity in the behavioral sciences, incorporating core principles from all fields, and based upon theoretical tools (game theory and the rational actor model) and data gathering techniques (experimental games in the laboratory and field) that transcend disciplinary boundaries. This article sketches a set of principles aimed at fostering such a unity. Key Words: behavioral science • game theory • experimental economics • rational actor model.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Herbert Gintis (2006). The Foundations of Behavior: The Beliefs, Preferences, and Constraints Model. Biological Theory 1 (2):123-127.
John P. Jackson (2010). Definitional Argument in Evolutionary Psychology and Cultural Anthropology. Science in Context 23 (1):121.
Bruno S. Frey, Silke Humbert & Friedrich Schneider (2010). What is Economics? Attitudes and Views of German Economists. Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (3):317-332.
Similar books and articles
David W. Gow Jr (2007). Do the Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences Need Each Other? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):27-28.
Joseph Margolis (2011). Toward a Theory of Human History. Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (3-4):245-273.
William P. Bechtel & Andrew Hamilton (2007). Reduction, Integration, and the Unity of Science: Natural, Behavioral, and Social Sciences and the Humanities. In T. Kuipers (ed.), Philosophy of Science: Focal Issues (Volume 1 of the Handbook of the Philosophy of Science). Elsevier.
E. Machery & K. Cohen (2012). An Evidence-Based Study of the Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (1):177-226.
Don Ross (2001). The Game-Theoretic Innocence of Experimental Behavioral Psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):426-427.
Herbert Gintis (2011). The Future of Behavioral Game Theory. Mind and Society 10 (2):97-102.
Steve Clarke (2007). Against the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):21-22.
Geoffrey M. Hodgson (2007). Rationality Versus Program-Based Behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):29-30.
Jeffrey Foss (2007). Game Theory for Reformation of Behavioral Science Based on a Mistake. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):24-25.
Herbert Gintis (2007). A Framework for the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):1-16.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #146,686 of 1,140,105 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #147,976 of 1,140,105 )
How can I increase my downloads?