David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (1):1-39 (2003)
The paper aims at reconstructing the sequence of works through which the fixed-point technique entered the tool-box of modern economics and at establishing a link between this sequence and the neoclassical approach to economic modeling. The focus is on the change in the demonstration techniques caused by the spread of the so-called formalist approach to mathematical economics; this change was embodied by the fixed-point technique. The main conclusions of the paper are that the formalist revolution marked a dramatic discontinuity in the history of economic theory and that early game theory - despite having been the gateway through which the fixed-point entered economics - was only partly responsible for such a discontinuity.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Andy Denis (2006). Modeling Rational Agents: From Interwar Economics to Early Modern Game Theory, Nicola Giocoli, Edward Elgar, 2003, X + 464 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 22 (1):159-166.
Milan Zafirovski (2000). The Rational Choice Generalization of Neoclassical Economics Reconsidered: Any Theoretical Legitimation for Economic Imperialism? Sociological Theory 18 (3):448-471.
Robert C. Robinson (2006). Bounded Epistemology. Ssrn Elibrary.
Gustavo Cevolani (2011). Hayek in the Lab. Austrian School, Game Theory, and Experimental Economics. Logic and Philosophy of Science 9 (1):429-436.
Wenceslao J. Gonzalez (1998). Prediction and Prescription in Economics: A Philosophical and Methodological Approach. Theoria 13 (2):321-345.
Jenny B. Wahl, Truth in Fiction: An Economic Interpretation of the Modern Novel with Case Studies of Lolita, a Bend in the River, and the House of Mirth.
Steven Horwitz (1995). Feminist Economics: An Austrian Perspective. Journal of Economic Methodology 2 (2):259-280.
Filippo Cesarano (2006). Economic History and Economic Theory. Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (4):447-467.
Andrew Yuengert (2002). Why Did the Economist Cross the Road? The Hierarchical Logic of Ethical and Economic Reasoning. Economics and Philosophy 18 (2):329-349.
Roger E. Backhouse & Matthias Klaes (2009). Applying Economics, Using Evidence. Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (2):139-144.
Robert Wutscher, Robert P. Murphy & Walter E. Block (2010). Mathematics in Economics: An Austrian Methodological Critique. Philosophical Investigations 33 (1):44-66.
Herbert Gintis (2011). The Future of Behavioral Game Theory. Mind and Society 10 (2):97-102.
Vernon L. Smith (2008). Rationality in Economics: Constructivist and Ecological Forms. Cambridge University Press.
Herbert Gintis (2001). The Contribution of Game Theory to Experimental Design in the Behavioral Sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):411-412.
Paddy Jane McShane (2014). Game Theory and Belief in God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75 (1):3-12.
Added to index2012-02-20
Total downloads16 ( #225,387 of 1,796,192 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #284,809 of 1,796,192 )
How can I increase my downloads?