Neuroethical Issues in Neurogenetic and Neuro-Implantation Technology: The Need for Pragmatism and Preparedness in Practice and Policy
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 4 (3) (2010)
This comment responds to a remark made by Meloni et al concerning brain implants and brain-gene transfer—that we ought to give primacy to ethical issues inherent to medical utility rather than speculating on issues of potential misuse. It foregrounds the benefits, burdens and risks as well as how to validate consent to the use of such novel and uncertain techniques. It asks how legal claims would be handled in the absence of historical casuistry—constructs of responsibility and culpability for resultant harms. Finally, it confronts the practical question of how decisions about who receives state-of-the-art treatments are addressed, deliberated and articulated. Are we looking at a new “boutique neurology” or widely accessible applications requiring substantive changes in the health-economic infrastructure and better preparedness in practice and policy?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rob Reuzel (2004). Interactive Technology Assessment of Paediatric Cochlear Implantation. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):119-137.
Thomas Saretzki (2012). Legitimation Problems of Participatory Processes in Technology Assessment and Technology Policy. Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):7-26.
Sybil Francis (1999). Developing a Federal Policy on Research Misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):261-272.
Walter J. Freeman (1999). Neurogenetic Determinism is a Theological Doctrine. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):893-894.
Larry A. Hickman (2007). Pragmatism as Post-Postmodernism: Lessons From John Dewey. Fordham University Press.
Stanley R. Carpenter (1977). Philosophical Issues in Technology Assessment. Philosophy of Science 44 (4):574-593.
Peter O'brien, Nick Osbaldiston & Gavin Kendall (2013). ePortfolios and eGovernment: From Technology to the Entrepreneurial Self. Educational Philosophy and Theory:1-12.
Masudul Alam Choudhury & Mohammad Shahadat Hossain (2010). Neuro-Cybernetics of Socio-Scientific Systems. Mind and Society 9 (1):59-83.
Susan E. Cozzens (2008). Gender Issues in US Science and Technology Policy: Equality of What? Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):345-356.
David Wright (2011). A Framework for the Ethical Impact Assessment of Information Technology. Ethics and Information Technology 13 (3):199-226.
Erich Griessler (2012). One Size Fits All? On the Institutionalization of Participatory Technology Assessment and its Interconnection with National Ways of Policy-Making: The Cases of Switzerland and Austria. Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):61-80.
Rui Nunes (2001). Ethical Dimension of Paediatric Cochlear Implantation. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (4):337-349.
Gladys B. White (1989). Ethical Analyses in the Development of Congressional Public Policy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (5):575-585.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-05
Total downloads1 ( #484,054 of 1,413,388 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #154,345 of 1,413,388 )
How can I increase my downloads?