Species, Concept, and Thing: Theories of Signification in the Second Half of the Thirteenth Century
Medieval Philosophy and Theology 8 (1):21-52 (1999)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJ. William Forgie (2008). Kant and Existence: Critique of Pure Reason a 600/B 628. Kant-Studien 99 (1):1-12.
Mirko Yrjönsuuri (1998). The Compossibility of Impossibilities and Ars Obligatoria. History and Philosophy of Logic 19 (4):235-248.
Giorgio Pini (2011). Can God Create My Thoughts? Scotus's Case Against the Causal Account of Intentionality. Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (1):39-63.
Ingo Brigandt (2003). Species Pluralism Does Not Imply Species Eliminativism. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1305–1316.
Hugh Lehman (1967). Are Biological Species Real? Philosophy of Science 34 (2):157-167.
E. J. Ashwort (1991). Signification and Modes of Signifying in Thirteenth-Century Logic: A Preface to Aquinas on Analogy. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 1:39-67.
Mark Ridley (1989). The Cladistic Solution to the Species Problem. Biology and Philosophy 4 (1):1-16.
Jean Gayon (1996). The Individuality of the Species: A Darwinian Theory? — From Buffon to Ghiselin, and Back to Darwin. Biology and Philosophy 11 (2):215-244.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads10 ( #106,239 of 549,060 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,060 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
