David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 33 (1):1-18 (2002)
It seems that many qualitative researchers have still not contextualized the role of validity in qualitative analysis.This article enumerates three factors that must be taken into account: The philosophy of science within which one works, the discipline to which one belongs, and the subfield of specialization that one pursues. Most researchers have encountered the question of validity within the context of empirical science, but validity does not have the same role within a phenomenological philosophy of science. Within the discipline of psychology, certain subfields ignore the validity issue for good reasons and other subfields specialize in developing strategies for validity. This article analyzes the reasons that the specialty of "test construction" focuses so strongly on validity issues and concludes that phenomenological qualitative research is not at all similar to the situation one finds in test construction. Rather, phenomenological qualitative research is closer to experimental situations and so the validity issue is not as pressing as is often supposed. The article ends with two different Husserlian perspectives on a theory of knowledge
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sonali K. Shah & Kevin G. Corley, Building Better Theory by Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide.
Stijn Mus (2012). The Case for Fiction as Qualitative Research: Towards a Non-Referential Ground for Meaning. Ethics and Education 7 (2):137-148.
Amedeo Giorgi (1992). Description Versus Interpretation: Competing Alternative Strategies for Qualitative Research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 23 (2):119-135.
Joanna Golinska-Pilarek & Emilio Munoz Velasco (2012). Reasoning with Qualitative Velocity: Towards a Hybrid Approach. In Emilio Corchado, Vaclav Snasel, Ajith Abraham, Michał Woźniak, Manuel Grana & Sung-Bae Cho (eds.), Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems. Springer 635--646.
Thomas Hadjistavropoulos & William E. Smythe (2001). Elements of Risk in Qualitative Research. Ethics and Behavior 11 (2):163 – 174.
Amedeo Giorgi (1994). A Phenomenological Perspective on Certain Qualitative Research Methods. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 25 (2):190-220.
Mary Ellen Macdonald & Franco A. Carnevale (2008). Qualitative Health Research and the Irb: Answering the “so What?” With Qualitative Inquiry. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (1):1-5.
Pamela S. Maykut (1994). Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophic and Practical Guide. Falmer Press.
Amedeo Giorgi (1997). The Theory, Practice, and Evaluation of the Phenomenological Method as a Qualitative Research Procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 28 (2):235-260.
Jonathan A. Smith (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage.
Iain Hay (ed.) (2000). Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography. Oxford University Press.
Denise E. DeLorme, George M. Sinkhan & Warren French (2001). Ethics and the Internet Issues Associated with Qualitative Research. Journal of Business Ethics 33 (4):271 - 286.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads360 ( #5,153 of 1,906,923 )
Recent downloads (6 months)52 ( #10,540 of 1,906,923 )
How can I increase my downloads?