Modal Logics and Philosophy
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The first edition, published by Acumen in 2000, became a prescribed textbook on modal logic courses. The second edition has been fully revised in response to readers' suggestions, including two new chapters on conditional logic, which was not covered in the first edition. "Modal Logics and Philosophy" is a fully comprehensive introduction to modal logics and their application suitable for course use. Unlike most modal logic textbooks, which are both forbidding mathematically and short on philosophical discussion, "Modal Logics and Philosophy" places its emphasis firmly on showing how useful modal logic can be as a tool for formal philosophical analysis. In part 1 of the book, the reader is introduced to some standard systems of modal logic and encouraged through a series of exercises to become proficient in manipulating these logics. The emphasis is on possible world semantics for modal logics and the semantic emphasis is carried into the formal method, Jeffrey-style truth-trees. Standard truth-trees are extended in a simple and transparent way to take possible worlds into account. Part 2 systematically explores the applications of modal logic to philosophical issues such as truth, time, processes, knowledge and belief, obligation and permission
|Keywords||Modality (Logic Philosophy Mathematical models|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$15.95 used (37% off) $20.15 new (20% off) $110.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BC199.M6.G57 2009|
|ISBN(s)||9780773536487 0773536531 0773536485 9781844652075|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Patrick Allo (2011). The Logic of 'Being Informed' Revisited and Revised. Philosophical Studies 153 (3):417-434.
Mark Colyvan (2006). Naturalism and the Paradox of Revisability. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (1):1–11.
Vincent F. Hendricks & John Symons (2006). Where's the Bridge? Epistemology and Epistemic Logic. Philosophical Studies 128 (1):137 - 167.
Alexander Bird (2006). Potency and Modality. Synthese 149 (3):447-52.
George Pavlakos (2005). On the Necessity of the Interconnection Between Law and Morality. Ratio Juris 18 (1):64-83.
Similar books and articles
Susan Haack (1978). Philosophy of Logics. Cambridge University Press.
Robert Goldblatt (2011). Quantifiers, Propositions, and Identity: Admissible Semantics for Quantified Modal and Substructural Logics. Cambridge University Press.
Alexander Chagrov (1997). Modal Logic. Oxford University Press.
Torben Braüner (2002). Modal Logic, Truth, and the Master Modality. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (4):359-386.
Kosta Došen (1985). Models for Stronger Normal Intuitionistic Modal Logics. Studia Logica 44 (1):39 - 70.
Marcus Kracht & Frank Wolter (1997). Simulation and Transfer Results in Modal Logic – a Survey. Studia Logica 59 (2):149-177.
Robert Feys (1965). Modal Logics. Louvain, E. Nauwelaerts.
John Mccarthy (1997). Modality, Si! Modal Logic, No! Studia Logica 59 (1):29-32.
Minghui Ma (2010). Toward Model-Theoretic Modal Logics. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (2):294-311.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-08-21
Total downloads1 ( #807,859 of 1,911,519 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,144 of 1,911,519 )
How can I increase my downloads?