David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 39 (3):557-578 (2008)
In December 1924 Wolfgang Pauli proposed the idea of an inner degree of freedom of the electron, which he insisted should be thought of as genuinely quantum mechanical in nature. Shortly thereafter Ralph Kronig and, independently, Samuel Goudsmit and George Uhlenbeck took up a less radical stance by suggesting that this degree of freedom somehow corresponded to an inner rotational motion, though it was unclear from the very beginning how literal one was actually supposed to take this picture, since it was immediately recognised that it would very likely lead to serious problems with Special Relativity if the model were to reproduce the electron's values for mass, charge, angular momentum, and magnetic moment. However, probably due to the then overwhelming impression that classical concepts were generally insufficient for the proper description of microscopic phenomena, a more detailed reasoning was never given. In this contribution I shall investigate in some detail what the restrictions on the physical quantities just mentioned are, if they are to be reproduced by rather simple classical models of the electron within the framework of Special Relativity. It turns out that surface stresses play a decisive role and that the question of whether a classical model for the electron does indeed contradict Special Relativity can only be answered on the basis of an exact solution, which has hitherto not been given
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Julian Schwinger (1983). Electromagnetic Mass Revisited. Foundations of Physics 13 (3):373-383.
Paul Forman (1968). The Doublet Riddle and Atomic Physics Circa 1924. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 59:156-174.
Citations of this work BETA
Michel Janssen (2009). Drawing the Line Between Kinematics and Dynamics in Special Relativity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 40 (1):26-52.
Similar books and articles
Steven French (2000). Putting a New Spin on Particle Identity. In R. Hilborn & G. Tino (eds.), Spin Statistics Connection and Commutation Relations. 305-318.
Laura Ruetsche (2006). Johnny's So Long at the Ferromagnet. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):473-486.
Huping Hu & Maoxin Wu, Spin as Primordial Self-Referential Process Driving Quantum Mechanics, Spacetime Dynamics and Consciousness.
Katherine Bedard (1998). Bohm, Spin, and the Bell Inequalities. Synthese 114 (3):405-444.
Vesselin Noninski, A Quantum Mechanical Measurement Leading to Simultaneous Spin-Up and Spin-Down State of a Single Electron.
Newton da Costa, Jean-Yves Béziau & Otávio Bueno (1996). Malinowski and Suszko on Many-Valued Logics: On the Reduction of Many-Valuedness to Two-Valuedness. Modern Logic 6 (1):272--299.
Robert M. Richman (1999). The Use of One-Electron Quantum Numbers to Describe Polyelectronic Systems. Foundations of Chemistry 1 (2):173-181.
Domenico Giulini (2008). Electron Spin or “Classically Non-Describable Two-Valuedness”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 39 (3):557-578.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #336,475 of 1,906,942 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #200,756 of 1,906,942 )
How can I increase my downloads?