David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):38-64 (2002)
In 1941, Tarski published an abstract, finitely axiomatized version of the theory of binary relations, called the theory of relation algebras, He asked whether every model of his abstract theory could be represented as a concrete algebra of binary relations. He and Jonsson obtained some initial, positive results for special classes of abstract relation algebras. But Lyndon showed, in 1950, that in general the answer to Tarski's question is negative. Monk proved later that the answer remains negative even if one adjoins finitely many new axioms to Tarski's system. In this paper we describe a far-reaching generalization of the positive results of Jonsson and Tarski, as well as of some later, related results of Maddux. We construct a class of concrete models of Tarski's axioms-called coset relation algebras-that are very close in spirit to algebras of binary relations, but are built using systems of groups and cosets instead of elements of a base set. The models include all algebras of binary relations, and many non-representable relation algebras as well, We prove that every atomic relation algebra satisfying a certain measurability condition-a condition generalizing the conditions imposed by Jonsson and Tarski-is essentially isomorphic to a coset relation algebra. The theorem raises the possibility of providing a positive solution to Tarski's problem by using coset relation algebras instead of the standard algebras of binary relations
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Tarek Sayed Ahmed (2008). On Complete Representations of Reducts of Polyadic Algebras. Studia Logica 89 (3):325 - 332.
Roger D. Maddux (1991). The Origin of Relation Algebras in the Development and Axiomatization of the Calculus of Relations. Studia Logica 50 (3-4):421 - 455.
Roger D. Maddux (1994). Undecidable Semiassociative Relation Algebras. Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (2):398-418.
Robin Hirsch, Ian Hodkinson & Roger D. Maddux (2002). Relation Algebra Reducts of Cylindric Algebras and an Application to Proof Theory. Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (1):197-213.
Roger D. Maddux (1989). Nonfinite Axiomatizability Results for Cylindric and Relation Algebras. Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (3):951-974.
Bronisław Tembrowski (1983). The Theory of Boolean Algebras with an Additional Binary Operation. Studia Logica 42 (4):389 - 405.
Roger D. Maddux (1992). Relation Algebras of Every Dimension. Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1213-1229.
Vera Stebletsova & Yde Venema (2001). Undecidable Theories of Lyndon Algebras. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (1):207-224.
Vera Stebletsova (2000). Weakly Associative Relation Algebras with Polyadic Composition Operations. Studia Logica 66 (2):297-323.
Robert Goldblatt (1985). An Algebraic Study of Well-Foundedness. Studia Logica 44 (4):423 - 437.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #290,530 of 1,789,832 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #166,717 of 1,789,832 )
How can I increase my downloads?