Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (2):262-272 (2010)
|Abstract||Since Freges terms were meant to refer always to sets, that is, entities composed of individuals. Classical philosophy up to Leibniz and Kant had a different view on this questionBegriffes syntaxhighercorresponding to the idea which Leibniz used in the construction of his characteristic numbers. Thus, this paper is an addendum to Corcorans theory via predicate logic|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Reinhard Muskens (2007). Intensional Models for the Theory of Types. Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (1):98-118.
Christopher Menzel (1993). The Proper Treatment of Predication in Fine-Grained Intensional Logic. Philosophical Perspectives 7:61-87.
E. H. Alves & J. A. D. Guerzoni (1990). Extending Montague's System: A Three Valued Intensional Logic. Studia Logica 49 (1):127 - 132.
Imre Ruzsa (1981). An Approach to Intensional Logic. Studia Logica 40 (3):269 - 287.
O. Bradley Bassler (1998). Leibniz on Intension, Extension, and the Representation of Syllogistic Inference. Synthese 116 (2):117-139.
Daniel Gallin (1975). Intensional and Higher-Order Modal Logic: With Applications to Montague Semantics. American Elsevier Pub. Co..
Added to index2010-06-04
Total downloads32 ( #43,414 of 722,857 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,857 )
How can I increase my downloads?