David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Fordham University Press (2000)
This book concerns itself with an issue that is not sufficiently addressed in the literature: Heidegger’s philosophy of science. Although a great deal of attention is paid to Heidegger’s later critique of technology, no one has systematically studied how he understood “science.” Many readers will be surprised to learn, through this book, that Heidegger developed the essentials of a fairly sophisticated philosophy of science, one that in many ways invites comparison with that of Thomas Kuhn. Glazebrook demonstrates that Heidegger’s philosophy of science is not neatly divided into “early” and “late” (or “Heidegger I” and “Heidegger II”) but is, rather, an ongoing development over at least three periods, bound together as an analysis of modern science and an uncovering of other possibilities for understanding nature. Glazebrook states in her introduction, “This reading of Heidegger is radical. It cuts to the root of his thinking, for I argue that what are taken to be Heidegger’s many and significant contributions to philosophy—that is, his overcoming of metaphysics, his rereading of the ancients, his critique of technology and representational thinking, his vision and revision of language, truth, and thinking—have at their core an inquiry into science that drove his thinking for sixty years. I am not arguing for a new reading of a few texts, or for adjustments and refinements of existing readings of Heideggger. Rather, I am bringing to light a new basis on which to interpret his work as a whole.”.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$14.00 used (54% off) $19.25 new (36% off) $85.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||B3279.H49.G57 2000|
|ISBN(s)||0823220370 0823220389 9780823220380|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Cathryn Carson (2010). Science as Instrumental Reason: Heidegger, Habermas, Heisenberg. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 42 (4):483-509.
Shannon Dea (2009). Heidegger and Galileo’s Slippery Slope. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 48 (1):59-76.
Damian Veal (2005). Editorial Introduction. Angelaki 10 (1):1 – 31.
Pablo Schyfter (2012). Standing Reserves of Function: A Heideggerian Reading of Synthetic Biology. Philosophy and Technology 25 (2):199-219.
Robert Shaw (2013). The Implications for Science Education of Heidegger's Philosophy of Science. Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (5):546-570.
Similar books and articles
Daniel O. Dahlstrom (2001). Heidegger's Concept of Truth. Cambridge University Press.
James E. Faulconer & Mark A. Wrathall (eds.) (2000). Appropriating Heidegger. Cambridge University Press.
David Wittenberg (2001). Philosophy, Revision, Critique: Rereading Practices in Heidegger, Nietzsche, and Emerson. Stanford University Press.
Søren Riis (2011). Towards the Origin of Modern Technology: Reconfiguring Martin Heidegger's Thinking. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 44 (1):103-117.
Jeff Kochan (2010). Latour's Heidegger. Social Studies of Science 40 (4):579-598.
Jeff Kochan (2011). Getting Real with Rouse and Heidegger. Perspectives on Science 19 (1):81-115.
Babette Babich (2011). On Mitchell and on Glazebrook on Βίος. In Pol Vandevelde (ed.), Supplement to the 2011 Proceedings of the Heidegger Circle.
Don Ihde (2010). Heidegger's Technologies: Postphenomenological Perspectives. Fordham University Press.
David Wood (2002). Thinking After Heidegger. Blackwell Publishers.
John Sallis (ed.) (1970). Heidegger and the Path of Thinking. Pittsburgh,Duquesne University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #70,150 of 1,413,355 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #94,237 of 1,413,355 )
How can I increase my downloads?