David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 11 (1):9-26 (2001)
The essence of the theory of minima naturalia is the contention that a physical body is not infinitely divisible qua that specific body. A drop of water cannot be divided again and again and still maintain its “wateriness”. There are several statements in Aristotle's Physics which suggest such an interpretation, and the theory of minima naturalia is commonly considered to have originated in the thirteenth century as an interpretation of these statements. The present paper is a preliminary presentation of the role of Ibn Rushd in the evolution of the theory, hitherto neglected. His theory developed not only as an elaboration on the “suitable” statements of Aristotle, but mainly as an attempt to solve the difficulties raised by Aristotle's thesis that body and motion are continuous, infinitely divisible entities and are associated qua such. According to Ibn Rushd's interpretation, body and motion are associated not qua being continuous but qua having indivisible minimal parts. It seems that Epicurus' and Ibn Rushd's theories of minima developed as responses to Physics VI and offer modifications of classical atomism and of classical Aristotelianism , which to a certain extent reduce the gap between these two systems
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Nader El-Bizri (2011). The Groundbreaking Physics of Averroës. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):210-214.
Similar books and articles
Nadja Germann (2010). Review of Averroes (Ibn Rushd) of Cordoba, Richard C. Taylor (Ed., Tr.), Long Commentary on the De Anima of Aristotle. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (2).
Averroës (1984). Ibn Rushd's Metaphysics: A Translation with Introduction of Ibn Rushd's Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics, Book Lām. E.J. Brill.
AverroëS. (2003). The Attitude of Islam Towards Science and Philosophy: A Translation of Ibn Rushd's (Averroës) Famous Treatise Faslul-Al-Maqal. Sarup & Sons.
Eberhard Knobloch (2002). The Knowledge of Arabic Mathematics by Clavius. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 12 (2):257-284.
Abuʼl Walid Muhammad ibn Rushd (1999). The Definitive Statement. In Jim Colville, Ibn Ṭufayl, Muḥammad ibn ʻAbd al-Malik & Averroës (eds.), Two Andalusian Philosophers. Kegan Paul International
N. V. Efremova (2009). The Unity of Philosophy and Religion According to Ibn-Rushd. In M. T. Stepani͡ant͡s (ed.), Knowledge and Belief in the Dialogue of Cultures. Council for Research in Values and Philosophy
Gerhard Endress (1995). Averroes' De Caelo Ibn Rushd's Cosmology in His Commentaries on Aristotle's On the Heavens. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 5 (1):9.
Miquel Forcada (2006). Ibn Bajja and the Classification of the Sciences in Al-Andalus. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 16 (2):287-307.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #213,663 of 1,796,208 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #116,661 of 1,796,208 )
How can I increase my downloads?