Graduate studies at Western
Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2):291-308 (2007)
|Abstract||Contemporary Kant scholarship generally takes Kant’s conception of humanity in his ethical writings to refer to beings with rational capacities. 1 According to this interpretation, when Kant tells us in the Categorical Imperative’s Formula of Humanity [FH] to “act so that you use humanity…always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means,” we are to treat anyone with rational capacities this way. 2 However, Richard Dean has recently revived an alternative interpretation that he traces to H. J. Paton. 3 According to this interpretation, by ‘humanity’ Kant really means the good will, and, furthermore, Dean takes this interpretation to be the more defensible view within Kant’s ethical system.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Richard Dean (2008). Glasgow's Conception of Kantian Humanity. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2):pp. 307-314.
Michael Neumann (2000). Did Kant Respect Persons? Res Publica 6 (3):285-299.
Japa Pallikkathayil (2010). Deriving Morality From Politics: Rethinking the Formula of Humanity. Ethics 121 (1).
Samuel Duncan (2011). “There is None Righteous”: Kant on the Hang Zum Bösen and the Universal Evil of Humanity. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):137-163.
Oliver Sensen (2009). Kant's Conception of Human Dignity. Kant-Studien 100 (3):309-331.
William Nelson (2008). Kant's Formula of Humanity. Mind 117 (465):85-106.
Richard Dean (2006). The Value of Humanity in Kant's Moral Theory. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads52 ( #23,812 of 739,357 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,357 )
How can I increase my downloads?