Presuppositions, truth values, and expressing propositions
In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. Oxford University Press (2005)
| Abstract | Philosophers like to talk about propositions. There are many reasons for this. Perhaps the most common is that philosophers are sometimes more interested in the content of a thought or utterance than in the particular sentence or utterance that might express it on some occasion. Propositions are offered as these contents. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobert C. Koons (1993). Faith, Probability and Infinite Passion. Faith and Philosophy 10 (2):145-160.
Edward N. Zalta (1993). A Philosophical Conception of Propositional Modal Logic. Philosophical Topics 21 (2):263-281.
Michael J. Cholbi (2003). Contingency and Divine Knowledge in Ockham. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):81-91.
Thomas C. Ryckman (1989). On Believing, Saying and Expressing. Synthese 79 (2):191 - 200.
Jonathan Schaffer (2012). Necessitarian Propositions. Synthese 189 (1):119-162.
Marek Nowak & Daniel Vanderveken (1995). A Complete Minimal Logic of the Propositional Contents of Thought. Studia Logica 54 (3):391 - 410.
Kent Bach (2009). Perspectives on Possibilities: Contextualism, Relativism, or What? In Andy Egan & B. Weatherson (eds.), Epistemic Modality. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads31 ( #39,311 of 549,070 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
