Where the paths meet: Remarks on truth and paradox
| Abstract | The study of truth is often seen as running on two separate paths: the nature path and the logic path. The former concerns metaphysical questions about the ‘nature’, if any, of truth. The latter concerns itself largely with logic, particularly logical issues arising from the truth-theoretic paradoxes. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesG. Hellman (1985). Determination and Logical Truth. Journal of Philosophy 82 (November):607-16.
Kevin Scharp (2010). Truth's Saviour? Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):183-188.
Tim Maudlin (2004). Truth and Paradox: Solving the Riddles. Oxford University Press.
Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2011). Lessons on Truth From Mediaeval Solutions to the Liar Paradox. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242):58-78.
John MacFarlane (2008). Truth in the Garden of Forking Paths. In Max KâObel & Manuel Garcia-Carpintero (eds.), Relative Truth. Oxford University Press.
Paul Horwich (2010). Truth-Meaning-Reality. Oxford University Press.
Lionel Shapiro (2011). Deflating Logical Consequence. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (243):320-342.
Noriaki Iwasa (2011). That Truth Exists is More Logical. Think 10 (27):109-112.
Jc Beall & Michael Glanzberg (2008). Where the Paths Meet: Remarks on Truth and Paradox. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 32 (1):169-198.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #123,092 of 549,093 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
