Inheriting 'philosophy': The case of Austin and Derrida revisited
Ratio 13 (4):307–331 (2000)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobert Eaglestone & Simon Glendinning (eds.) (2008). Derrida's Legacies: Literature and Philosophy. Routledge.
Michael Durrant & Charles Sayward (1967). Austin On Whether Every Proposition Has A Contradictory. Analysis 27 (April):167-170.
Georges de Schrijver (2010). The Political Ethics of Jean-François Lyotard and Jacques Derrida. Peeters.
J. Hillis Miller (2009). For Derrida. Fordham University Press.
Hagi Kenaan (2002). Language, Philosophy and the Risk of Failure: Rereading the Debate Between Searle and Derrida. Continental Philosophy Review 35 (2):117-133.
Simon Glendinning (2011). Derrida: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Alice Crary (2007). Beyond Moral Judgment. Harvard University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads21 ( #58,789 of 549,224 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,224 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
