Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):1-19 (1997)
|Abstract||I address the commentators' calls for clarification of theoretical terms, discussion of similarities to other proposals, and extension of the ideas. In doing so, I keep the focus on the purpose of memory: enabling the organism to make sense of its environment so that it can take action appropriate to constraints resulting from the physical, personal, social, and cultural situations.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Kaschak & Arthur Glenberg (2004). Interactive Alignment: Priming or Memory Retrieval? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):201-202.
Jeffrey Blustein (2008). The Moral Demands of Memory. Cambridge University Press.
Richard B. Miller (2009). The Moral and Political Burdens of Memory. Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (3):533-564.
Marya Schechtman (2010). Memory and Identity. Philosophical Studies 153 (1):65-79.
Matthew P. Walker (2005). Past, Present, and the Future: Discussions Surrounding a New Model of Sleep-Dependent Learning and Memory Processing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):87-104.
Boris M. Velichkovsky (1997). The “Mesh” Approach to Human Memory: How Much of Cognitive Psychology has to Be Thrown Away? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):39-39.
Asher Koriat & Morris Goldsmith (1997). The Myriad Functions and Metaphors of Memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):27-28.
Kate Booth (2008). Risdon Vale: Place, Memory, and Suburban Experience. Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (3):299 – 311.
Yves Rossetti & Emmanuel Procyk (1997). What Memory is for Action: The Gap Between Percepts and Concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):34-36.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads48 ( #22,348 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?