Paley's design argument as an inference to the best explanation, or, Dawkins' dilemma
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 31 (4):579-597 (2000)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesHelen de Cruz & Johan de Smedt (2010). Paley's Ipod: The Cognitive Basis of the Design Argument Within Natural Theology. Zygon 45 (3):665-684.
Nicholas Humphrey (2006). Consciousness: The Achilles Heel of Darwinism? Thank God, Not Quite. In John Brockman (ed.), Intelligent Thought: Science Versus the Intelligent Design Movement. Vintage.
Gregory W. Dawes (2007). What is Wrong with Intelligent Design? International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (2):69 - 81.
Andre Ariew (2007). Teleology. In David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge University Press.
David Glass (2012). Darwin, Design and Dawkins' Dilemma. Sophia 51 (1):31-57.
Jonah N. Schupbach (2005). Paley's Inductive Inference to Design. Philosophia Christi 7 (2):491-502.
Graham Oppy (2002). Paley's Argument for Design. Philo 5 (2):161-173.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads28 ( #44,113 of 549,119 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,740 of 549,119 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
