Graduate studies at Western
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):409-422 (2013)
|Abstract||People in our liberal pluralistic society have conflicting intuitions about the legitimacy of coercive hard paternalism, though respect for agency provides a common source of objection to it. The hard paternalist must give adequate reasons for her coercion which are acceptable to a free and equal agent. Coercion that fails to meet with an agent’s reasonable evaluative commitments is at least problematic and risks being authoritarian. Even if the coercer claims no normative authority over the coercee, the former still uses coercion to replace the latter’s reasons or will with his own reasons or will. But does every hard paternalistic view have to invite such objection? Throughout I will assume that defenders of what I will call “Neutral Paternalism” (NP) and “Commonsense Paternalism” (CP) aim to offer reasons for coercion all can reasonably endorse despite evaluative diversity, in opposition to more objectionable forms of coercive paternalism, such as those which defend it on religious or perfectionist grounds. I will argue, nonetheless, that Gerald Dworkin’s defense of NP and Danny Scoccia’s defense of CP succumb to the same problems of objectionable imposition that saddle other forms of coercive paternalism. The shortcomings in their views suggest that even modest hard paternalism is nonetheless problematic for liberals|
|Keywords||Paternalism Liberalism Neutrality Self-determination Gerald Dworkin Gerald Gaus|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Thaddeus Mason Pope, Is Public Health Paternalism Really Never Justified? A Response to Joel Feinberg.
Thaddeus Mason Pope, Monstrous Impersonation: A Critique of Consent-Based Justifications for Hard Paternalism.
Kalle Grill (2007). The Normative Core of Paternalism. Res Publica 13 (4):441-458.
Thaddeus Mason Pope, A Definition and Defense of Hard Paternalism: A Conceptual and Normative Analysis of the Restriction of Substantially Autonomous Self-Regarding Conduct, Chapter Five - a New Normative Defense of Hard Paternalism.
Simon Clarke (2002). A Definition of Paternalism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (1):81-91.
William Glod (2010). Political Liberalism, Basic Liberties, and Legal Paternalism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (2):177-196.
Danny Scoccia (2010). Physician-Assisted Suicide, Disability, and Paternalism. Social Theory and Practice 36 (3):479-498.
Danny Scoccia (2008). In Defense of Hard Paternalism. Law and Philosophy 27 (4):351 - 381.
Bjørn Hofmann (2003). Technological Paternalism: On How Medicine has Reformed Ethics and How Technology Can Refine Moral Theory. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):343-352.
Marion Smiley (1989). Paternalism and Democracy. Journal of Value Inquiry 23 (4):299-318.
David Crossley (1999). Paternalism and Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 21 (4):291 - 302.
Added to index2012-02-06
Total downloads38 ( #35,926 of 739,398 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,423 of 739,398 )
How can I increase my downloads?