David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Erkenntnis 36 (1):117-128 (1992)
v. Savigny's commentary is a remarkable achievement and essential reading for all scholars of the Investigations. It brings to the exegetical enterprise something new and important — the challenge of an immanent approach and the tool of German philology. However, some of the potential gains may be lost by his leitmotiv of a tight master-scheme. In my view this ‘central theses’ scheme presses Wittgenstein's multifaceted masterpiece into an unsuitable Procrustean bed and tends to impoverish v. Savigny's account. Nevertheless there remains the palatable pattern-recipe (for me partly spoiled by an overdose of community-views). Most importantly, v. Savigny approaches most of the material in an innovative and illuminating way. He provides good reasons for questioning, although not necessarily overturning, many key claims of recent scholarship
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Susan H. Peet (2004). Controversy and Critical Thinking Involving African-American Families. Inquiry 24 (1-2):13-19.
Hans-Johann Glock (2008). What is Analytic Philosophy? Cambridge University Press.
Robert Paulson (1969). A Discussion Relating to the National Council of Teachers for Critical Analysis. Journal of Critical Analysis 1 (1):1-13.
Cory Juhl (2003). Review of Hans-Johann Glock,, Quine and Davidson on Language, Thought and Reality. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (11).
John Miller (1999). Critical Thinking and Asynchronous Discussion. Inquiry 19 (1):18-27.
Hans-Johann Glock (2010). Wittgenstein on Concepts. In Arif Ahmed (ed.), Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press
Frans H. van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst (2003). A Pragma-Dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion. Argumentation 17 (4):365-386.
M. A. van Rees (2001). The Diagnostic Power of the Stages of Critical Discussion in the Analysis and Evaluation of Problem-Solving Discussions. Argumentation 15 (4):457-470.
Hans-Johann Glock (ed.) (2001). Wittgenstein: A Critical Reader. Blackwell Publishers.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #189,864 of 1,700,226 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #362,609 of 1,700,226 )
How can I increase my downloads?