Ethics and Behavior 7 (4):329 – 336 (1997)
|Abstract||In his challenging article, Steneck (1997) criticized the creation of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) system established by the 1985 amendments to the Animal Welfare Act. He saw the IACUC review and approval of biomedical and behavioral research with animals as an unnecessary "reassignment" of duties from existing animal care programs to IACUC committees. He argued that the committees are unable to do the work expected of them for basically three reasons: (a) the membership lacks the expertise in matters relevant to animal research and care, (b) there exists an inherent and disabling conflict of interest, and (c) the committee's operational base of authority is alien to academic culture and violates essential aspects of academic freedom. In addition, he found that the system is burdensome, requiring enormous expenditures of time and money that inappropriately diverts resources away from the business of scientific discovery. We dispute several aspects of Steneck's historical account and the coherence of his proposals. We believe his proposals, if followed, would be a step back into a failed past.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
D. Micah Hester (ed.) (2008). Ethics by Committee: A Textbook on Consultation, Organization, and Education for Hospital Ethics Committees. Rowman & Littlefield Pub..
Lawrence Finsen (1988). Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees: A New Set of Clothes for the Emperor? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):145-158.
Farol N. Tomson (1989). Approving the Use of Animals in Medical Education. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (1).
Mark Rice (2011). The Institutional Review Board is an Impediment to Human Research: The Result is More Animal-Based Research. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 6 (1):12-.
F. Barbara Orlans (1997). Ethical Decision Making About Animal Experiments. Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):163 – 171.
Tim Allen & Michael D. Kreger (eds.) (2000). Information Resources for Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees: [1985-1999]. U.S. Dept. Of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Agricultural Library, Animal Welfare Information Center.
Shelley L. Gavin & Harold A. Herzog (1992). The Ethical Judgment of Animal Research. Ethics and Behavior 2 (4):263 – 286.
Czesław Radzikowski (2006). Protection of Animal Research Subjects. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):103-110.
Nicholas H. Steneck (1997). Role of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in Monitoring Research. Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):173 – 184.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #245,904 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?