Synthese 122 (1-2):53-68 (2000)
|Abstract||_Words_, _Thoughts and Theories _argues that infants and children discover the physical and psychological features of the world by a process akin to scientiﬁc inquiry, more or less as conceived by philosophers of science in the 1960s (the theory theory). This essay discusses some of the philosophical background to an alternative, more popular, “modular” or “maturational” account of development, dismisses an array of philosoph- ical objections to the theory theory, suggests that the theory theory offers an undeveloped project for artiﬁcial intelligence, and, relying on recent psychological work on causation, offers suggestions about how principles of causal inference may provide a developmental solution to the “frame problem”.|
|Keywords||Causal Frame Inference Inquiry Metaphysics Psychology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Brandon N. Towl, Jonathan Halvorson & Carl F. Craver (2003). An Elusive Target: A Critical Review of Clark Glymour's the Mind's Arrows. [REVIEW] Philosophical Psychology 16 (1):157 – 164.
Alison Gopnik & Laura Schulz (eds.) (2007). Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation. Oxford University Press.
Ron Amundson (1983). The Epistemological Status of a Naturalized Epistemology. Inquiry 26 (3):333 – 344.
Kevin B. Korb (1998). The Frame Problem: An AI Fairy Tale. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 8 (3):317-351.
Scott Hendricks (2006). The Frame Problem and Theories of Belief. Philosophical Studies 129 (2):317-33.
David Danks (2005). The Supposed Competition Between Theories of Human Causal Inference. Philosophical Psychology 18 (2):259 – 272.
Clark Glymour (2000). Android Epistemology for Babies: Relections on Words, Thoughts and Theories. Synthese 122 (1-2):53-68.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #101,164 of 722,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,028 of 722,864 )
How can I increase my downloads?