Graduate studies at Western
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (3):199-208 (2004)
|Abstract||Respect for human embryos is often defended on the basis of the potentiality argument: embryos deserve respect because they already possess potentially the features that in adults are fully actualized. Opponents of this argument challenge it by claiming that if embryos should be respected because they are potentially adults, then gametes should be respected because they are potentially embryos. This article rejects this reductio ad absurdum argument by showing that there are two different types of potentiality involved so that the transitivity of potentiality does not hold up in this case. Respect for embryos does not logically entail respect for gametes.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
S. Matthew Liao (2006). The Embryo Rescue Case. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (2):141-147.
Aaron Simmons (2012). Do Embryos Have Interests? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (1):57-66.
Sarah Chan & Muireann Quigley (2007). Frozen Embryos, Genetic Information and Reproductive Rights. Bioethics 21 (8):439–448.
Suzanne Holland (2001). Contested Commodities at Both Ends of Life: Buying and Selling Gametes, Embryos, and Body Tissues. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (3):263-284.
Gregor Damschen & Dieter Schönecker (2006). Saving Seven Embryos or Saving One Child? Michael Sandel on the Moral Status of Human Embryos. Journal of Philosophical Research (Ethics and the Life Sciences):239-245.
Gregor Damschen & Dieter Schönecker (2007). Saving Seven Embryos or Saving One Child? Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):239-245.
Mary B. Mahowald (2004). Respect for Embryos and the Potentiality Argument. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (3):209-214.
Carolyn McLeod & Françoise Baylis (2006). Feminists on the Inalienability of Human Embryos. Hypatia 21 (1):1-14.
Stephen S. Hanson (2006). “More on Respect for Embryos and Potentiality: Does Respect for Embryos Entail Respect for in Vitro Embryos?”. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (3):215-226.
Alfonso Gómez-Lobo (2005). On Potentiality and Respect for Embryos: A Reply to Mary Mahowald. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (2):105-110.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #101,504 of 756,890 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,433 of 756,890 )
How can I increase my downloads?