Rereading Tarski on logical consequence

Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (2):249-297 (2009)
I argue that recent defenses of the view that in 1936 Tarski required all interpretations of a language to share one same domain of quantification are based on misinterpretations of Tarskis views on the logical correctness of certain omega-arguments, on the Tarskian proof that Etchemendy took to be modal and fallacious, and on Tarskicommon concept of consequence”
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 14,232
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Timothy Bays (2001). On Tarski on Models. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1701-1726.
Rudolf Carnap (1959). Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Rudolf Carnap (1937). The Logical Syntax of Language. London, K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd..
Alonzo Church (1956). Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

View all 31 references

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

76 ( #28,238 of 1,699,716 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #128,702 of 1,699,716 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.