David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Theology 16 (1):77-88 (2004)
Radical Orthodoxy offers insight into the relationship between Christianity and culture. But it errs in its one-sided reading of modernity, its attempt to reduce philosophy to theology, and its prescription of a pre-modern metaphysics as the only authentic theological foundation. These suggest a fear of contingency and a desire for the immediate grasp of the divine which might circumvent history’s messiness. The result is a construal of reality that is in general inimical to an authentic Catholic reading of reality. Catholic theology must be more faithful to the incarnational and eschatological structure of revelation—and thus to contingency—than either it or Radical Orthodoxy has been in the past. Aquinas’ defense of philosophy and Metz’s principle of “dangerous memory” offer ways to overcome this fear and to enjoy created contingency, secure in hope for the eschatological transformation which God in Christ has promised to all persons and all epochs
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rob Inkpen & Derek Turner (2012). The Topography of Historical Contingency. Journal of the Philosophy of History 6 (1):1-19.
Dirk-Martin Grube & Peter Jonkers (eds.) (2008). Religions Challenged by Contingency: Theological and Philosophical Approaches to the Problem of Contingency. Brill.
Raoni Padui (2010). The Necessity of Contingency and the Powerlessness of Nature. Idealistic Studies 40 (3):243-255.
Patrick Hutchings (2003). Natural Theology: Wit, the Electric Shock, the Aesthetic Idea—and a Belated Acknowledgment of Points Made by the Late MR Gershon Weiler. Sophia 42 (1):9-26.
John Milbank, Catherine Pickstock & Graham Ward (eds.) (1999). Radical Orthodoxy: A New Theology. Routledge.
Michael Pfau (2007). Who's Afraid of Fear Appeals? Contingency, Courage and Deliberation in Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Philosophy and Rhetoric 40 (2):216-237.
Xunwu Chen (2011). Crisis and Possibility: The Ethical Implication of Contingency. Asian Philosophy 21 (3):257 - 268.
John W. Burbidge (2007). Hegel's Systematic Contingency. Palgrave Macmillan.
Rebecca Konyndyk (2012). Holy Fear. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (1):1-22.
Mihhail Lotman (2001). The semiotics of culture and the phenomenology of fear. Sign Systems Studies 29 (2):417-439.
Clint Ballinger, Classifying Contingency in the Social Sciences: Diachronic, Synchronic, and Deterministic Contingency.
Eric Roark (2006). Aquinas's Unsuccessful Theodicy. Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):247-256.
Fabio Gironi (2011). Meillassoux’s Speculative Philosophy of Science: Contingency and Mathematics. Pli 22:26-61.
Barry Allen (2003). The Abyss of Contingency: Purposiveness and Contingency in Darwin and Kant. History of Philosophy Quarterly 20 (4):373 - 391.
Todd Davies (2005). Radical Contingency in Sharing Behavior and its Consequences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):821-821.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads10 ( #312,454 of 1,789,795 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #418,435 of 1,789,795 )
How can I increase my downloads?