Australasian Association of Philosophy (1982)
|Abstract||The ontology of the "tractatus", In terms of which objects are characterized as propertyless simples, Is coherent provided wittgenstein is not mistakenly taken to be a constructive atomist building complexes from simples. A geometrical model is given to illustrate this. It is also shown that an ontology like that of the "tractus" removes much of the conceptual puzzlement of modern particle physics and has implications for current debates about realism, Possible worlds and rigid designators|
|Keywords||Logic, Symbolic and mathematical Language and languages Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Call number||B3376.W563.T7334 1982|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Carruthers (1990). The Metaphysics of the Tractatus. Cambridge University Press.
Heikki Kannisto (1986). Thoughts and Their Subject: A Study of Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Distributed by Akateeminen Kirjakauppa.
Ludwig Wittgenstein (1971). Prototractatus. Ithaca, N.Y.,Cornell University Press.
Erik[from old catalog] Stenius (1960). Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Ithaca, N.Y.,Cornell University Press.
Irving Copi (1966). Essays on Wittgenstein's Tractatus. New York, Macmillan.
Irving M. Copi (1973). Essays on Wittgenstein's Tractatus. New York,Hafner Press.
H. O. Mounce (1981). Wittgenstein's Tractatus: An Introduction. University of Chicago Press.
G. E. M. Anscombe (1971/2000). An Introduction to Wittgenstein's Tractatus. St. Augustine's Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?