David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
World Futures 58 (2 & 3):241 – 263 (2002)
We stand at the start of a new millennium with a growing awareness of what is wrong with our civilization but little agreement as to what to do. From environmental crises to democratic systems dominated by moneyed interests, the list of dangers is long and growing. Each issue has a band of defenders who struggle to right that particular wrong but, because these bands are disjointed, the broad movement they serve remains incoherent and weak. The broad movement is usually described as toward "sustainable civilization," but its precise designation is "integral society." The challenge for the emerging "new science" is to provide a framework for understanding that unifies and gives direction to the disparate efforts that comprise the integral movement. This framework must address three needs. First, it must provide a sound understanding of why, despite our sophistication, things seem to be going badly in so many spheres. Secondly, it must present a believable vision of where our civilization should be headed. Finally, it must provide a sense that there are concrete steps we can take to achieve the deep dreams that most of us actually share. What we need, in short, is not more disparate insights, but rather a collective intellectual unity that integrates existing insights into a logically coherent and emotionally compelling whole. Such integration, however, cannot be constructed artificially, by committee or consensus. Rather, true integration can only come from a unified scientific understanding of why various ideas connect. Today, a scientific story capable of such unifying understanding is found in the expanded theory of evolution that is emerging from the union of a broad range of scientific efforts. This theory also serves as a unifying thread for an integrated new science. This article outlines the "dynamic" view of evolution and how it unites integral efforts.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jean A. Hamilton, Kelley L. Phillips & Arlene Green (2004). Integral Medicine and Health. World Futures 60 (4):295 – 302.
Darcy Riddell (2005). Evolving Approaches to Conservation: Integral Ecology and Canada's Great Bear Rainforest. World Futures 61 (1 & 2):63 – 78.
Steve McIntosh (2007). Integral Consciousness and the Future of Evolution: How the Integral Worldview is Transforming Politics, Culture, and Spirituality. Paragon House.
Brian G. Eddy (2005). Integral Geography: Space, Place, and Perspective. World Futures 61 (1 & 2):151 – 163.
S. J. Goerner (2004). An Introduction. World Futures 60 (4):273 – 286.
Sean Esbjörn-Hargens (2005). Integral Ecology: The What, Who, and How of Environmental Phenomena. World Futures 61 (1 & 2):5 – 49.
Wendelin M. Küpers (2007). Phenomenology and Integral Pheno-Practice of Wisdom in Leadership and Organization. Social Epistemology 21 (2):169 – 193.
Dorothy Lagerroos (2004). Sustainability Seen Through an Integral Lens. World Futures 60 (4):319 – 325.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #238,049 of 1,796,217 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #98,157 of 1,796,217 )
How can I increase my downloads?