David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Minds and Machines 1 (2):129-166 (1991)
Cognitive science uses the notion of computational information processing to explain cognitive information processing. Some philosophers have argued that anything can be described as doing computational information processing; if so, it is a vacuous notion for explanatory purposes.An attempt is made to explicate the notions of cognitive information processing and computational information processing and to specify the relationship between them. It is demonstrated that the resulting notion of computational information processing can only be realized in a restrictive class of dynamical systems called physical notational systems (after Goodman's theory of notationality), and that the systems generally appealed to by cognitive science-physical symbol systems-are indeed such systems. Furthermore, it turns out that other alternative conceptions of computational information processing, Fodor's (1975) Language of Thought and Cummins' (1989) Interpretational Semantics appeal to substantially the same restrictive class of systems
|Keywords||Computation cognition representation information processing physical symbol systems language of thought|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
D. Broadbent (1985). A Question of Levels: Comment on McClelland and Rumelhart. Journal of Experimental Psychology 114:189-92.
Noam Chomsky (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. The Mit Press.
Noam A. Chomsky (1980). Rules and Representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (127):1-61.
Citations of this work BETA
Bela Julesz (1993). Consciousness and Focal Attention: Answer to John Searle. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):191.
Karl Pfeifer (1993). Causal Dispositions, Aspectual Shape and Intentionality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):196.
John R. Searle (1993). Consciousness, Attention and the Connection Principle. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):198.
Similar books and articles
G. Tesauro, D. Touretzky & T. Leen (eds.) (1995). Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 7. MIT Press.
Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic (2011). Significance of Models of Computation, From Turing Model to Natural Computation. Minds and Machines 21 (2):301-322.
Thomas Metzinger (1988). Review. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 29 (1):143-146.
Axel Cleeremans (2006). Computational Correlates of Consciousness. In Steven Laureys (ed.), The Boundaries of Consciousness: Neurobiology and Neuropathology: Progress in Brain Research. Elsevier.
Gordana Dodig Crnkovic & Mark Burgin (eds.) (forthcoming). INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION. World Scientific.
Valerie Gray Hardcastle (1995). A Critique of Information Processing Theories of Consciousness. Minds and Machines 5 (1):89-107.
Orlin Vakarelov (2012). The Information Medium. Philosophy and Technology 25 (1):47-65.
Eric Dietrich & Arthur B. Markman (1998). All Information Processing Entails Computation, or, If R. A. Fisher Had Been a Cognitive Scientist . . Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):637-638.
Gualtiero Piccinini & Andrea Scarantino (2010). Computation Vs. Information Processing: Why Their Difference Matters to Cognitive Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (3):237-246.
Gualtiero Piccinini & Andrea Scarantino (2011). Information Processing, Computation, and Cognition. Journal of Biological Physics 37 (1):1-38.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #104,063 of 1,102,763 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #120,475 of 1,102,763 )
How can I increase my downloads?