Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):285-286 (2005)
|Abstract||Schmitt recognized that research is needed to identify other factors associated with sex ratio and with sociosexuality that may explain cross-cultural variation in sexual behavior. One such factor may be the risk of sperm competition. Sperm competition theory may lead us to a more complete explanation of cultural variation in sexual behavior.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
R. Brock (2004). Aristotle on Sperm Competition in Birds. The Classical Quarterly 54 (1):277-278.
Thomas R. Alley (1982). Competition Theory, Evolution, and the Concept of an Ecological Niche. Acta Biotheoretica 31 (3).
Gwen J. Broude (1999). What the Human Annals Tell Us. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):888-888.
Joseph N. Abraham (1998). An Ecological Theory of Sexual Dimorphism in Animals. Acta Biotheoretica 46 (1).
Peter D. Sozou, Sally Sheldon & Geraldine M. Hartshorne, Personal View: Withdrawal of Consent by Sperm Donors.
Greg Downey (2005). The Contribution of Cross-Cultural Study to Dynamic Systems Modeling of Emotions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):201-202.
Finn Spicer (2010). Cultural Variations in Folk Epistemic Intuitions. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (4):515-529.
David C. Geary (1998). Sexual Selection, the Division of Labor, and the Evolution of Sex Differences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):444-447.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #246,694 of 739,461 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,461 )
How can I increase my downloads?