David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):285-286 (2005)
Schmitt recognized that research is needed to identify other factors associated with sex ratio and with sociosexuality that may explain cross-cultural variation in sexual behavior. One such factor may be the risk of sperm competition. Sperm competition theory may lead us to a more complete explanation of cultural variation in sexual behavior.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
R. Brock (2004). Aristotle on Sperm Competition in Birds. Classical Quarterly 54 (1):277-278.
Thomas R. Alley (1982). Competition Theory, Evolution, and the Concept of an Ecological Niche. Acta Biotheoretica 31 (3).
Gwen J. Broude (1999). What the Human Annals Tell Us. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):888-888.
Joseph N. Abraham (1998). An Ecological Theory of Sexual Dimorphism in Animals. Acta Biotheoretica 46 (1).
Peter D. Sozou, Sally Sheldon & Geraldine M. Hartshorne, Personal View: Withdrawal of Consent by Sperm Donors.
Greg Downey (2005). The Contribution of Cross-Cultural Study to Dynamic Systems Modeling of Emotions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):201-202.
Finn Spicer (2010). Cultural Variations in Folk Epistemic Intuitions. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (4):515-529.
David C. Geary (1998). Sexual Selection, the Division of Labor, and the Evolution of Sex Differences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):444-447.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #159,722 of 1,102,914 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #46,874 of 1,102,914 )
How can I increase my downloads?