David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
We demonstrate the existence of altruism via kin selection in artificial life and explore its nuances. We do so in the Avida system through a setup that is based on the behavior of colicinogenic bacteria: Organisms can kill unrelated organisms in a given radius but must kill themselves to do so. Initially, we confirm!results found in the bacterial world: Digital organisms do sacrifice themselves for their kin—an extreme example of altruism— and do so more often in structured environments, where kin are always nearby, than in well-mixed environments, where the location of kin is stochastically determined. Having shown that helping one’s kin is advantageous, we turn our attention to investigating the efficacy and implications of the strategies of kincheaters, those who receive help from kin but do not return it. Contrary to the expectations of current theory, we find that kin-cheaters outcompete kin-altruists. Our results cause us to question the stability of strategies that involve altruism between kin. Knowing that kin-altruism persists in biological systems, however, we search for, and find, conditions that allow!kin-based altruism to persist in evolving!systems despite the!presence of kin-cheaters.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Lisa Cassidy (2013). Thoughts on the Bioethics of Estranged Biological Kin. Hypatia 28 (1):32-48.
Michael Gurven (2004). Tolerated Reciprocity, Reciprocal Scrounging, and Unrelated Kin: MaKing Sense of Multiple Models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):572-579.
Hector N. Qirko (2004). Does Commitment Theory Explain Non-Kin Altruism in Religious Contexts? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):746-747.
H. J. Rose (1954). C. W. Westrup: A Near-Kin Within the Kïn. A Comparative Study. (K. Danske Vidensk. Selskab, Hist.-Fil. Medd. 33. 4.) Pp. 26. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1952. Paper, Kr. 3. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 4 (02):178-.
Peter J. Richersonb, Influences on Communication About Reproduction: The Cultural Evolution of Low Fertility.
John Ziker (2004). Nonmarket Cooperation in the Indigenous Food Economy of Taimyr, Arctic Russia: Evidence for Control and Benefit. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):571-571.
Richard Zach (2005). Critical Study of Michael Potter’s Reason’s Nearest Kin. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 46:503-513.
Lesley Newson & Tom Postmes (2005). Less Restricted Mating, Low Contact with Kin, and the Role of Culture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):291-292.
Elliott Sober (1992). The Evolution of Altruism: Correlation, Cost, and Benefit. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 7 (2):177-187.
Douglas T. Kenrick & Jill M. Sundie (2005). How Do Cultural Variations Emerge From Universal Mechanisms? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):827-828.
Raymond Hames (2010). Grandparental Transfers and Kin Selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (1):26-27.
Jonathan Birch (2014). Hamilton's Rule and Its Discontents. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (2):381-411.
Added to index2011-06-24
Total downloads11 ( #156,452 of 1,679,386 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #182,933 of 1,679,386 )
How can I increase my downloads?