The Case of Theaetetus
Phronesis 46 (1):1-37 (2001)
| Abstract | Any comprehensive interpretation of the "Theaetetus" has to provide answers to, among others, two very general questions concerning that dialogue: "What is Plato's relation to the problems faced in the "Theaetetus"?" and "What is the significance of the absence of the Forms from the discussion of the "Theaetetus", given their undoubted relevance to the topic of the dialogue, i.e. knowledge?" Predominantly, the answer given to the first question in the literature has been that the problems are those that Plato is trying to tackle and the one to the second question, when it has been addressed at all, that the Forms are left out of the discussion because Plato no longer thought them relevant, either for having abandoned or seriously revised them, by the time of writing the "Theaetetus". In this study of the Wax Block and the Aviary models of judgment that occur in the second part of the "Theaetetus" as part of its discussion of the problem of false judgment, I argue that the problems faced there actually arise because of the neglect of Forms. The discussion of the second part is, I contend, carried out on a materialist ontology, an ontology assumed because it suits the definition of knowledge as true judgment which inaugurates that part of the dialogue, an ontology in no way subscribed to by Plato. The Wax Block is, I explain, a materialist model and fails in the case of judgments about numbers for treating them on a par with material subjects, ignoring their intelligible status. In particular, it fails to distinguish judging 5 and 7 to be 11 from judging 12 to be 11 because of its neglect of Forms; Plato would distinguish those judgments by distinguishing 5 and 7 from 12 with help from his part-whole analysis, to which the Forms are essential | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFrancisco J. Gonzalez (2009). Plato and Heidegger: A Question of Dialogue. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Pamela M. Huby (1976). Plato: Theaetetus John McDowell: Plato, Theaetetus. Translated with Notes. (Clarendon Plato Series.) Pp. Viii + 264. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974. Cloth, £5·00 (Paper, £1·90). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 26 (01):65-66.
Deborah K. W. Modrak (2012). Meaning and Cognition in Plato's Cratylus and Theaetetus. Topoi 31 (2):167-174.
Francisco J. Gonzalez (2007). Dialogue Discontinued: Heidegger on a Few Pages of Plato's Theaetetus. Epoché 11 (2):371-392.
Raphael Woolf (2004). A Shaggy Soul Story: How Not to Read the Wax Tablet Model in Plato's Theaetetus. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (3):573–604.
David Barton (1999). The Theaetetus on How We Think. Phronesis 44 (3):163-180.
T. D. J. Chappell (2004/2005). Reading Plato's Theaetetus. Hackett Pub. Co..
David Bostock (1988). Plato's Theaetetus. Oxford University Press.
Charles H. Kahn (2007). Why Is the Sophist a Sequel to the Theaetetus? Phronesis 52 (1):33-57.
Gokhan Adalier (2001). The Case of Theaetetus. Phronesis 46 (1):1-37.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads30 ( #40,899 of 549,510 )Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #10,444 of 549,510 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
