A consistent way with paradox

Philosophical Studies 144 (3):377 - 389 (2009)
Abstract
Consideration of a paradox originally discovered by John Buridan provides a springboard for a general solution to paradoxes within the Liar family. The solution rests on a philosophical defence of truth-value-gaps and is consistent (non-dialetheist), avoids ‘revenge’ problems, imports no ad hoc assumptions, is not applicable to only a proper subset of the semantic paradoxes and implies no restriction of the expressive capacities of language.
Keywords Paradox  Consistent  Cassationist  Liar  No–no  Buridan
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,365
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
J. L. Austin (1950). Truth. Aristotelian Society Supp 24 (1):111--29.
Laurence Goldstein (2000). A Unified Solution to Some Paradoxes. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (1):53–74.

View all 12 references

Citations of this work BETA
Laureano Luna (2010). A FailedCassatio? A Note on Valor and Martínez on Goldstein. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (3pt3):383-386.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

46 ( #30,304 of 1,089,064 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #42,757 of 1,089,064 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.