A Response to Sestini's (2011) Response

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):1004-1005 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

From Popperian Science to Normal Science. Commentary on Sestini (2010).Maya J. Goldenberg - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):306-310.
Two conceptions of response-dependence.Rafael De Clercq - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 107 (2):159-177.
A Response to Mike Thike (2011).Steve Fuller - 2011 - Spontaneous Generations 5 (1):75-78.
Response-dependence about aesthetic value.Michael Watkins & James Shelley - 2012 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (3):338-352.
Phenomenology and Psychopathology.Josef Parnas, Louis Sass & Dan Zahavi - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (1):37-39.
Why Response-Dependence Theories of Morality are False.Jeremy Randel Koons - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (3):275-294.
How (not) to specify normal conditions for response-dependent concepts.Jussi Haukioja - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2):325 – 331.
Scepticism and the Development of the Transcendental Dialectic.Brian A. Chance - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2):311-331.
Enlightening the fully informed.Michael Pelczar - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (1):29-56.
Surveying Philosophers: a Response to Kuntz & Kuntz.Wesley Buckwalter - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (4):515-524.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-05

Downloads
39 (#379,248)

6 months
5 (#441,012)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Maya J. Goldenberg
University of Guelph