David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (2):229-251 (2001)
Some empirically minded philosophers of science argue that the evidence should choose the best theory from among theoretical rivals. However, the evidence may not speak clearly, a problem of 'underdetermination of theory by data'. We examine this problem in a concrete setting, rival theories of smoking behaviour. We investigate whether several uncontested pieces of empirical evidence allow us to choose between two competing theoretical perspectives on smoking, rational choice and non-rational choice, respectively. Next, we develop a more refined taxonomy of smoking theories, and consider the consequences for theory testing. Finally, we examine some normative aspects of theory choice involving the appropriate scope of government action.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Larry Laudan (1990). Demystifying Underdetermination. In C. Wade Savage (ed.), Scientific Theories. University of Minnesota Press 267-97.
Citations of this work BETA
Andrew M. Yuengert (2006). Model Selection and Multiple Research Goals: The Case of Rational Addiction. Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (1):77-96.
Roger E. Backhouse & Matthias Klaes (2009). Applying Economics, Using Evidence. Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (2):139-144.
Similar books and articles
John Worrall (2011). Underdetermination, Realism and Empirical Equivalence. Synthese 180 (2):157 - 172.
P. D. Magnus (2005). Background Theories and Total Science. Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1064-1075.
Judy C. Nixon & Judy F. West (1989). The Ethics of Smoking Policies. Journal of Business Ethics 8 (6):409 - 414.
David M. Ludington (1991). Smoking in Public: A Moral Imperative for the Most Toxic of Environmental Wastes. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (1):23 - 27.
Michela Massimi (2004). What Demonstrative Induction Can Do Against the Threat of Underdetermination: Bohr, Heisenberg, and Pauli on Spectroscopic Anomalies (1921–24). Synthese 140 (3):243-277.
Jarrett Leplin (1997). The Underdetermination of Total Theories. Erkenntnis 47 (2):203-215.
Malcolm Horne (2010). Johnny Wilkinson's Addiction. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (1):31-34.
P. D. Magnus (2005). Reckoning the Shape of Everything: Underdetermination and Cosmotopology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (3):541-557.
Walter E. Block (2010). Free to Smoke. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 29 (1/4):135-153.
Martin J. Lecker (2009). The Smoking Penalty: Distributive Justice or Smokism? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 84 (1):47 - 64.
K. Voigt (2010). Smoking and Social Justice. Public Health Ethics 3 (2):91-106.
Ian McDiarmid (2008). Underdetermination and Meaning Indeterminacy: What is the Difference? [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 69 (3):279 - 293.
D. S. Silva (2011). Smoking Bans and Persons with Schizophrenia: A Straightforward Use of the Harm Principle? Public Health Ethics 4 (2):143-148.
M. Lavin (1990). Let the Patients Smoke: A Defence of a Patient Privilege. Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (3):136-140.
Added to index2012-02-20
Total downloads3 ( #620,981 of 1,907,521 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #341,955 of 1,907,521 )
How can I increase my downloads?