Graduate studies at Western
Cognitive Science 34 (7):1357-1377 (2010)
|Abstract||The contributions to this special issue on cognitive development collectively propose ways in which learning involves developing constraints that shape subsequent learning. A learning system must be constrained to learn efficiently, but some of these constraints are themselves learnable. To know how something will behave, a learner must know what kind of thing it is. Although this has led previous researchers to argue for domain-specific constraints that are tied to different kinds/domains, an exciting possibility is that kinds/domains themselves can be learned. General cognitive constraints, when combined with rich inputs, can establish domains, rather than these domains necessarily preexisting prior to learning. Knowledge is structured and richly differentiated, but its “skeleton” must not always be preestablished. Instead, the skeleton may be adapted to fit patterns of co-occurrence, task requirements, and goals. Finally, we argue that for models of development to demonstrate genuine cognitive novelty, it will be helpful for them to move beyond highly preprocessed and symbolic encodings that limit flexibility. We consider two physical models that learn to make tone discriminations. They are mechanistic models that preserve rich spatial, perceptual, dynamic, and concrete information, allowing them to form surprising new classes of hypotheses and encodings|
|Keywords||Novelty Domain‐specificity Perception Constraints Learning Inference Embodiment Cognitive development|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Axel Barceló Aspeitia, Ángeles Eraña & Robert Stainton (2010). The Contribution of Domain Specificity in the Highly Modular Mind. Minds and Machines 20 (1):19-27.
Vladimir M. Sloutsky (2010). Mechanisms of Cognitive Development: Domain-General Learning or Domain-Specific Constraints? Cognitive Science 34 (7):1125-1130.
Kenneth R. Livingston (1998). The Case for General Mechanisms in Concept Formation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):581-582.
David M. Jacobs, Sverker Runeson & Isabell E. K. Andersson (2001). Reliance on Constraints Means Detection of Information. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):679-680.
Dan Klein & Christopher D. Manning, From Instance-Level Constraints to Space-Level Constraints: Making the Most of Prior Knowledge in Data Clustering.
John E. Hummel & Philip J. Kellman (1998). Finding the Pope in the Pizza: Abstract Invariants and Cognitive Constraints on Perceptual Learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):30-30.
Douglas Edwards (2012). On Alethic Disjunctivism. Dialectica 66 (1):200-214.
Stephanie Denison & Fei Xu (2010). Integrating Physical Constraints in Statistical Inference by 11-Month-Old Infants. Cognitive Science 34 (5):885-908.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads12 ( #101,328 of 740,542 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,957 of 740,542 )
How can I increase my downloads?