Graduate studies at Western
Environmental Ethics 9 (1):45-55 (1987)
|Abstract||Deep ecology is examined from the perspective of scientific ecology. Two norms, self-realization and biocentric equality, are considered central to deep ecology, and are explored in brief. Concepts of scientific ecology that seem to form a bridge to these norms are ecological hierarchical organization, the exchange of energy, material and information, and the development of species within ecosystems and the biosphere. While semantic problems exist, conceptually it appears that deep ecology norms can be interpreted through scientific ecology|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael E. Zimmerman (1993). Rethinking the Heidegger-Deep Ecology Relationship. Environmental Ethics 15 (3):195-224.
Richard A. Watson (1990). George Bradford: How Deep is Deep Ecology? And Return of the Son of Deep Ecology. Environmental Ethics 12 (4):371-374.
David Keller (1997). Gleaning Lessons From Deep Ecology. Ethics and the Environment 2 (2):139 - 148.
Deane Curtin (1994). Dōgen, Deep Ecology, and the Ecological Self. Environmental Ethics 16 (2):195-213.
Alan E. Wittbecker (1986). Deep Anthropology. Environmental Ethics 8 (3):261-270.
Warwick Fox (1989). The Deep Ecology-Ecofeminism Debate and its Parallels. Environmental Ethics 11 (1):5-25.
Harold Glasser (1997). On Warwick Fox's Assessment of Deep Ecology. Environmental Ethics 19 (1):69-85.
Colette Sciberras (2002). Deep Ecology and Ecofeminism: The Self in Environmental Philosophy. Dissertation, Lancaster
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,359 of 725,494 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,864 of 725,494 )
How can I increase my downloads?