David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kant-Studien 95 (4):405-425 (2004)
Reason is precariously positioned in the Critique of Pure Reason. The Transcendental Analytic leaves no entry for reason in the cognitive process, and the Transcendental Dialectic restricts reason to noncognitive roles. Yet, in the Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic, Kant contends that the ideas of reason can be used in empirical investigation and eventually knowledge acquisition. Given what Kant has said, how is this possible? Kant attempts to answer this in A663–A666/B691–B694 in the Appendix, where he argues that principles of reason “have objective but indeterminate validity.” In Part I of this paper, I explain the full motivation behind this section. In Part II, I provide an exegesis of it. In particular, to reach his conclusion that principles of reason have objective but indeterminate validity, I interpret Kant as making three arguments from analogy. Finally, in Part III, I show that the first and third arguments fail—and what this means for Kant’s project.
|Keywords||Kant, Immanuel Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic principles of reason regulative use of reason|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Nathaniel Jason Goldberg (2009). Historicism, Entrenchment, and Conventionalism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 40 (2):259 - 276.
Nathaniel Goldberg (2009). Response-Dependence, Noumenalism, and Ontological Mystery. European Journal of Philosophy 17 (4):469-488.
Nathaniel Goldberg (2011). Interpreting Thomas Kuhn as a Response-Dependence Theorist. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (5):729 - 752.
Mark Pickering (2011). The Idea of the Systematic Unity of Nature as a Transcendental Illusion. Kantian Review 16 (3):429-448.
Similar books and articles
Theo Van Willigenburg (2000). Moral Compromises, Moral Integrity and the Indeterminacy of Value Rankings. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (4):385 - 404.
James R. O'Shea (1997). The Needs of Understanding: Kant on Empirical Laws and Regulative Ideals. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2):216 – 254.
Elisa Paganini (2011). Vague Objects Without Ontically Indeterminate Identity. Erkenntnis 74 (3):351-362.
Thomas Nagel (1997). The Last Word. OUP USA.
Aaron Bunch (2010). 'Objective Validity' and 'Objective Reality' in Kant's B-Deduction of the Categories. Kantian Review 14 (2):67-92.
Carl Hoefer (2007). The Third Way on Objective Probability: A Sceptic's Guide to Objective Chance. Mind 116 (463):549-596.
Theo van Willigenburg (2000). Moral Compromises, Moral Integrity and the Indeterminacy of Value Rankings. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (4):385-404.
Ángel Pinillos (2003). Counting and Indeterminate Identity. Mind 112 (445):35-50.
Sanford S. Levy (1987). Paul Ramsey and the Rule of Double Effect. Journal of Religious Ethics 15 (1):59 - 71.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #87,403 of 1,098,973 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #175,054 of 1,098,973 )
How can I increase my downloads?