Evaluating evidence in criminal cases by means of the evidentiary value model
In Peter Gärdenförs, Bengt Hansson, Nils-Eric Sahlin & Sören Halldén (eds.), Evidentiary Value: Philosophical, Judicial, and Psychological Aspects of a Theory: Essays Dedicated to Sören Halldén on His Sixtieth Birthday. C.W.K. Gleerups (1983)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesEdward Stein (2008). A Functional Approach to the Spousal Evidentiary Privileges. Episteme 5 (3):pp. 374-387.
Stephen J. A. Ward (2007). Utility and Impartiality: Being Impartial in a Partial World. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (2 & 3):151 – 167.
Aaron Rizzieri (2009). Evidence Does Not Equal Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 153 (2):235-242.
Steven D. Hales (2001). Evidence and the Afterlife. Philosophia 28 (1-4):335-346.
Katrina L. Sifferd (2013). Translating Scientific Evidence Into the Language of the ‘Folk’: Executive Function as Capacity-Responsibility. In Nicole A. Vincent (ed.), Legal Responsibility and Neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
Nils-Eric Sahlin (1983). Do People Combine Evidence According to an Evidentiary Value Model? In Peter Gärdenförs, Bengt Hansson, Nils-Eric Sahlin & Sören Halldén (eds.), Evidentiary Value: Philosophical, Judicial, and Psychological Aspects of a Theory: Essays Dedicated to Sören Halldén on His Sixtieth Birthday. C.W.K. Gleerups.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
