David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 73 (1):109 - 144 (1987)
A conception of social epistemology is articulated with links to studies of science and opinion in such disciplines as history, sociology, and political science. The conception is evaluative, though, rather than purely descriptive. Three types of evaluative approaches are examined but rejected: relativism, consensualism, and expertism. A fourth, truth-linked, approach to intellectual evaluation is then advocated: social procedures should be appraised by their propensity to foster true belief. Standards of evaluation in social epistemics would be much the same as those in individual epistemics, only the objects of evaluation would be interpersonal patterns of judgment and communication, and institutional practices that bear on opinion formation.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Nozick (1981). Philosophical Explanations. Harvard University Press.
Alvin I. Goldman (1986). Epistemology and Cognition. Harvard University Press.
R. Rorty (1981). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press.
Thomas S. Kuhn (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Selim Berker (2015). Reply to Goldman: Cutting Up the One to Save the Five in Epistemology. Episteme 12 (2):145-153.
Alexander Bird (2010). Social Knowing: The Social Sense of 'Scientific Knowledge'. Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):23-56.
Jonathan M. Weinberg (2007). Moderate Epistemic Relativism and Our Epistemic Goals. Episteme 4 (1):66-92.
Don Fallis (2005). The Epistemic Costs and Benefits of Collaboration. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (Supplement):197-208.
Don Fallis (2006). The Epistemic Costs and Benefits of Collaboration. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (S1):197-208.
Similar books and articles
Esther-Mirjam Sent (1997). An Economist's Glance at Goldman's Economics. Philosophy of Science 64 (4):148.
Gary Hatfield (1986). Cognition and Epistemic Reliability: Comments on Goldman. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1987:312 - 318.
Alvin Goldman (1991). Social Epistemics and Social Psychology. Social Epistemology 5 (2):121 – 125.
Michael P. Levine (1989). Alvin I. Goldman's Epistemology and Cognition: An Introduction. Philosophia 19 (2-3):209-225.
Roger G. Koppl Robert Kurzban Lawrence Kobilinsky (2008). Epistemics for Forensics. Episteme 5 (2):pp. 141-159.
Roger G. Koppl, Robert Kurzban & Lawrence Kobilinsky (2008). Epistemics for Forensics. Episteme 5 (2):141-159.
James Maffie (1991). What is Social About Social Epistemics? Social Epistemology 5 (2):101 – 110.
Alvin I. Goldman (1986). The Cognitive and Social Sides of Epistemology. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:295 - 311.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads60 ( #73,224 of 1,911,370 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #48,924 of 1,911,370 )
How can I increase my downloads?