From Popperian Science to Normal Science. Commentary on Sestini (2010).
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):306-310 (2010)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Deborah G. Mayo (1996). Ducks, Rabbits, and Normal Science: Recasting the Kuhn's-Eye View of Popper's Demarcation of Science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (2):271-290.
Maya J. Goldenberg (2011). A Response to Sestini's (2011) Response. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):1004-1005.
Jack C. Carloye (1985). Normal Science and the Extension of Theories. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):241-256.
Neil Tennant (1985). Minimal Logic is Adequate for Popperian Science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):325-329.
Raphael Sassower (2005). Science and Culture. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (4):499-508.
E. Glas (2001). The 'Popperian Programme' and Mathematics - Part II: From Quasi-Empiricism to Mathematical Research Programmes. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):355-376.
Joseph Agassi (1982). How Technology Aids and Impedes the Growth of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:585 - 597.
Robert P. Farrell (2000). Will the Popperian Feyerabend Please Step Forward: Pluralistic, Popperian Themes in the Philosophy of Paul Feyerabend. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (3):257 – 266.
Ian Slater (2000). Normative Naturalism and Popperian Views on Reduction. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (3):325 – 326.
Dana Baker (2012). Kuhn Vs. Popper. Dissertation, Sam Houston State University
Adam Grobler (1997). Popperian Forum: Introduction. Foundations of Science 2 (2):349-350.
Ryszard Wójcicki (1997). Popperian Vs. Suppesian Theories. Foundations of Science 2 (2):375-382.
Peter Milne (1995). A Bayesian Defence of Popperian Science? Analysis 55 (3):213 - 215.
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-10-05Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

