Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- Irwin Goldstein (1986). Must There Be Indefinable Words? Metaphilosophy 17 (1):90–91.
Similar books and articles
People have always wondered how thinking takes place and what thoughts are constructed from. We typically experience our thoughts as involving pictorial (or sensory) contents or as being in words. Although this idea has been enshrined in psychology as the “dual code” theory of reasoning and memory, serious questions have been raised concerning this view. It appears that whatever the form of our thoughts it is unlikely that it is anything like our experience of them. But if thought is not in pictures or words, what form does it take? If we do not sometimes think in words, then what actually goes on when we think by engaging in an “inner dialogue”? And if we do not sometimes think in pictures, what goes on when we reason by creating and examining “mental images”?
Two subjects read short stories while writing lists of words at dictation. After some weeks of practice, they were able to write words, discover relations among dictated words, and categorize words for meaning, while reading for comprehension at normal speed. The performance of these subjects is not consistent with the notion that there are hxed limits to attentional..
59 words Main Text: 1108 words References: 114 words Total Text: 1281 words.
This book is a collection of biographical sketches of some of the leading figures of our time, though the figures aren't people but configurations of words.
68 words Main Text: 1256 words References: 192 words Total Text: 1516 words.
No categories
Discussion of Irwin Goldstein, Must there be indefinable words?
|
|
There are no threads in this forum |
Nothing in this forum yet.

