No outside, no inside: Duality, reality and Vasubandhu's illusory elephant
Asian Philosophy 16 (1):1 – 38 (2006)
| Abstract | Some of the basic terminology of Yogācāra philosophy needs reevaluation. Whereas commentaries almost universally gloss the term dvaya ('duality') with some version of the phrase grāhya grāhaka ca (lit. 'grasped and grasper', but usually translated as 'subject and object'), in fact this gloss is absent from the earliest strata. The term and its gloss are derived from separate streams of Yogācāra reasoning - one from discussions of linguistic conceptualization and the other from discussions of perception. Once we see that these two are distinct, it becomes clear that the commentarial literature asserts their identity in order to philosophically unify Yogācāra thought. One upshot of this is that even in this later assertion 'duality' refers not to the distinction between internal and external reality (as in 'textbook' Yogācāra), but to the falsely projected distinction between mental subjects and mental objects. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Guram Bezhanishvili & Ramon Jansana (2011). Priestley Style Duality for Distributive Meet-Semilattices. Studia Logica 98 (1-2):83-122.
Alex Wayman (1996). A Defense of Yogācāra Buddhism. Philosophy East and West 46 (4):447-476.
Frederick Travis & Jonathan Shear (forthcoming). Reply to Josipovic: Duality and Non-Duality in Meditation Research☆. Consciousness and Cognition.
Jay L. Garfield (1997). Vasubandhu's Treatise on the Three Natures Translated From the Tibetan Edition with a Commentary. Asian Philosophy 7 (2):133 – 154.
Bruno Teheux (2007). A Duality for the Algebras of a Łukasiewicz N + 1-Valued Modal System. Studia Logica 87 (1):13 - 36.
Vasubandhu (1939). The Trisvabhāvanirdeśa of Vasubandhu. Visvabharati.
Joel Feldman (2005). Vasubandhu's Illusion Argument and the Parasitism of Illusion Upon Veridical Experience. Philosophy East and West 55 (4):529-541.
Saam Trivedi (2005). Idealism and Yogacara Buddhism. Asian Philosophy 15 (3):231 – 246.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads31 ( #39,336 of 549,092 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,722 of 549,092 )How can I increase my downloads? |

