Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (1):137-147 (1996)
|Abstract||People see five kinds of views in epistemology and ontology as hinging on there being words a person can learn only by private ostensive definitions, through direct acquaintance with his own sensations: skepticism about other minds, 2. skepticism about an external world, 3. foundationalism, 4. dualism, and 5. phenomenalism. People think Wittgenstein refuted these views by showing, they believe, no word is learnable only by private ostensive definition. I defend these five views from Wittgenstein’s attack.|
|Keywords||solipsism private language discussion epistemology metaphysics|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
C. H. Whiteley (1956). Meaning and Ostensive Definition. Mind 65 (July):332-335.
Janina Kotarbinska (1960). On Ostensive Definitions. Philosophy of Science 27 (1):1-22.
Mark T. Thornton (1972). Ostensive Terms and Materialism. The Monist 56 (April):193-214.
E. D. Klemke (1971). Essays on Wittgenstein. Urbana,University of Illinois Press.
John A. Humphrey (1996). Kripke's Wittgenstein and the Impossibility of Private Language: The Same Old Story? Journal of Philosophical Research 21 (January):197-207.
P. M. S. Hacker (1975). Wittgenstein on Ostensive Definition. Inquiry 18 (3):267 – 287.
J. Temkin (1986). A Private Language Argument. Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):109-121.
George Wrisley (2011). Wherefore the Failure of Private Ostension? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):483 - 498.
G. E. M. Anscombe (1974). The Subjectivity of Sensation. Ajatus 36:3-18.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads62 ( #15,152 of 549,550 )
Recent downloads (6 months)20 ( #2,905 of 549,550 )
How can I increase my downloads?