Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy in the Contemporary World 1 (3):15-21 (1994)
|Abstract||In Law’s Empire, Ronald Dworkin argues that the choice between conflicting interpretations of law is, and should be, influenced by the aspiration to “integrity,” that is, the construction of law as a coherent whole, as though it were the product of a single author. I argue that, particularly under conditions where opinion on relevant issues is significantly divided, the search for a single coherent explanation of law may be seriously misleading. The idea of integrity is a principled basis for legal interpretation only where there is an underlying unity, rather than an underlying plurality. Dworkin suggests that there is a basis for striving toward such unity, and for an obligation to obey the law, in our “associative” obligations to fellow members of our political community. I argue that such obligations, to the extent that they exist, are too weak to provide an adequate basis for a moral obligation to obey the law|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
R. P. Peerenboom (1990). A Coup d'État in Law's Empire: Dworkin's Hercules Meets Atlas. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 9 (1):95 - 113.
Abner Greene (2012). Against Obligation: The Multiple Sources of Authority in a Liberal Democracy. Harvard University Press.
Stephen Perry (2006). Associative Obligations and the Obligation to Obey the Law. In Scott Hershovitz (ed.), Exploring Law's Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford University Press.
Pavlos Eleftheriadis (2010). Pluralism and Integrity. Ratio Juris 23 (3):365-389.
Steven Ross (1991). Law, Integrity, and Interpretation: Ronald Dworkin's Law's Empire. Metaphilosophy 22 (3):265-279.
Kevin T. Jackson (1993). Global Rights and Regional Jurisprudence. Law and Philosophy 12 (2):157 - 192.
Joseph Raz (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.
Ruth C. A. Higgins (2004). The Moral Limits of Law: Obedience, Respect, and Legitimacy. Oxford University Press.
Scott Hershovitz (ed.) (2006). Exploring Law's Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford University Press.
Alexandre Lefebvre (2007). Critique of Teleology in Kant and Dworkin: The Law Without Organs (Lwo). Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (2):179-201.
Dean Goorden (2012). Dworkin and Phenomenology of the “Pre-Legal”? Ratio Juris 25 (3):393-408.
Y. V. Satyanarayana (2008). Morality and Political Obligation. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 3:103-110.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?