Pragmatic Justification of Religious Faith

Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pascal's Wager is analyzed and critiqued in Part I. The main objections to Pascal's argument are raised and various attempts to salvage the argument are discussed. These problems include the dubious assumption that one is forced to believe either that God exists or that God does not exist, and the questionable assumption that one will gain infinite happiness if and only if God exists and one believes in God's existence. Also problematic is the use of an infinite value in an expected-value calculation. Part II argues for a pragmatic justification of religious faith that is inspired by but significantly different from Pascal's Wager. To construct this argument it is necessary to refine some traditional theological notions. God is conceived as "transcendent" in that he is qualitatively superior to any other possible being, yet "immanent" in that it is possible for him to have personal relationships with human beings. A "devout religious person" has an overriding goal to attain a good personal relationship with God; a person is "religious" to the extent that he pursues this goal. Certain kinds of personal relationships, such as love, constitute an extraordinarily valuable kind of human good, and such a relationship with God would constitute a kind of human good that is absolutely qualitatively superior, that is, qualitatively superior to any other possible kind of human good. The Principle of Expected Value is tailored for decision problems where goods of varying quality are deemed to be at stake, and the application of this principle yields that it is pragmatically rational to have an overriding goal to attain a good which is absolutely qualitatively superior. Thus it is pragmatically rational to be a devout religious person. This in turn yields that it is pragmatically rational to have "religious faith", which is viewed as a pragmatic commitment or assumption for practical purpose that God exists, and is to be distinguished sharply from other propositional attitudes such as the "belief" or "hope" that God exists.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Toward a Pragmatic Conception of Religious Faith.Joshua L. Golding - 1990 - Faith and Philosophy 7 (4):486-503.
Pascal's wager: pragmatic arguments and belief in God.Jeff Jordan - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
First Person and Third Person Reasons and Religious Epistemology.Linda Zagzebski - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):285 - 304.
Implicaturism.Tommi Lehtonen - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 45:177-183.
The Authorship of Faith: W. L. SESSIONS.W. L. Sessions - 1991 - Religious Studies 27 (1):81-97.
Religious conversion, self‐deception, and Pascal's wager.Ward E. Jones - 1998 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (2):167-188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references