Touch and Flesh in Aristotle's de Anima

Epoché 15 (2):435-446 (2010)
Abstract In this paper, I argue for the sense of touch as primary in Aristotle’s account of sensation. Touch, as the identifying and inaugurating distinction of sensate beings, is both of utmost importance to Aristotle as well as highly aporetic on his explanation. The issue of touch and the problematic of flesh, in particular, bring us to Merleau-Ponty’s account of flesh as the chiasmic fold and overlap of subject and object, of self and other, and to an incipient and veiled knowledge present in the body’s orientation to and within the world
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,664
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Mark Paterson (2009). The Human Touch. The Philosopher's Magazine (45):50-56.
    Mark Paterson (2009). The Human Touch. The Philosopher's Magazine (45):50-56.
    Edith Wyschogrod (1981). Empathy and Sympathy as Tactile Encounter. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (1):25-44.
    Matthew Ratcliffe (2011). What is Touch? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3):413 - 432.
    Matthew Ratcliffe (2008). Touch and Situatedness. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (3):299 – 322.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-12-01

    Total downloads

    11 ( #99,458 of 549,006 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    2 ( #37,272 of 549,006 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums