The Legal Analog of the Principle of Bivalence

Ratio Juris 16 (4):450-468 (2003)
The principle of bivalence is the assertion that every statement is either true or else false. Its legal analog, however, must be formulated relative to particular legal systems and in terms of validity rather than truth. It asserts that every statement of law that can be formulated in the vocabulary of a given legal system is valid or else invalid in that system. A line of New York cases is traced, beginning with Thomas v. Winchester . This case, which involved a poison mislabeled as a medicine, established an exception to the rule that a manufacturer or supplier is never liable for negligence to a remote purchaser. The court made an exception because a poison is an “imminently dangerous” thing. How far may this exception be applied to other fact‐situations? Some subsequent cases are examined, and it is considered whether there is no correct answer in these instances and, more dramatically, whether more than one correct answer is tenable. In either event the legal analog of bivalence would seem to fail
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1046/j.0952-1917.2003.00245.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,217
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
R. M. Dworkin (1988). Law's Empire. Harvard University Press.
Martin P. Golding (1983). Legal Reasoning. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Cheryl Misak (1990). Pragmatism and Bivalence. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (2):171 – 179.
Russell Trenholme (1994). Analog Simulation. Philosophy of Science 61 (1):115-131.
John Haugeland (1981). Analog and Analog. Philosophical Topics 12 (1):213-226.
Michael C. Rea (2006). Presentism and Fatalism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):511 – 524.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

17 ( #268,506 of 1,941,077 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #272,622 of 1,941,077 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.