David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophia 37 (2):261-280 (2009)
Donald Davidson used triangulation to do everything from explicate psychological and semantic externalism, to attack relativism and skepticism, to propose conditions necessary for thought and talk. At one point Davidson tried to bring order to these remarks by identifying three kinds of triangulation, each operative in a different situation. Here I take seriously Davidson’s talk of triangular situations and extend it. I start by describing Davidson’s situations. Next I establish the surprising result that considerations from one situation entail the possibility that at any one time one language is partially untranslatable into another. Because the possibility is time-indexed, it need not conflict with Davidson’s own argument against the possibility of untranslatability. I derive the result, not to indict Davidson, but to propose a new kind of triangulation, the reconciliation of untranslatability, which I investigate. Insofar as triangulation is central to Davidson’s views, getting a handle on his various triangular situations is key to getting a handle on his contributions to philosophy. Insofar as those contributions have enriched our understanding of how language, thought, and reality interrelate, extending Davidson’s model promises to extend our understanding too.
|Keywords||Davidson, Donald triangulation radical interpretation principle of charity language learning reconciliation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jerry A. Fodor (1975). The Language of Thought. Harvard University Press.
W. V. Quine (1960). Word and Object. The MIT Press.
Alfred Tarski (1944). The Semantic Conception of Truth: And the Foundations of Semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4 (3):341-376.
Donald Davidson (2005). Truth, Language and History. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Nathaniel Goldberg (2011). Interpreting Thomas Kuhn as a Response-Dependence Theorist. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (5):729 - 752.
Ben Kotzee (2014). Language Learning in Wittgenstein and Davidson. Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (4):413-431.
Similar books and articles
Robert Sinclair (2005). The Philosophical Significance of Triangulation: Locating Davidson's Non-Reductive Naturalism. Metaphilosophy 36 (5):708-728.
Claudine Verheggen (2007). Triangulating with Davidson. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (226):96-103.
Ingar Brinck (2004). Joint Attention, Triangulation and Radical Interpretation: A Problem and its Solution. Dialectica 58 (2):179–206.
Maria Lasonen & Tomas Marvan (2004). Davidson's Triangulation: Content‐Endowing Causes and Circularity. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (2):177 - 195.
Lajos L. Brons (2012). Dharmakīrti, Davidson, and Knowing Reality. Comparative Philosophy 3 (1):30-57.
Diana I. Pérez (2005). Is Thought Without Language Possible? Principia 9 (1-2):177-191.
Christian Beyer (2006). Mentale Simulation Und Radikale Interpretation. Grazer Philosophische Studien 70 (1):25-45.
William Child (2001). Triangulation: Davidson, Realism and Natural Kinds. Dialectica 55 (1):29–50.
Timothy J. Nulty (2006). Primitive Disclosive Alethism: Davidson, Heidegger, and the Nature of Truth. Peter Lang.
Timothy J. Nulty (2006). Davidsonian Triangulation and Heideggerian Comportment. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (3):443 – 453.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads80 ( #53,075 of 1,906,928 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #54,071 of 1,906,928 )
How can I increase my downloads?